Inverse and leveraged funds are a very important part of my investing. I have been able to weather the lows by using those funds and have gone beyond just preserving my initial capital. I am fully capable of using this type of strategy to manage my money when needed, and do not believe I should be regulated more than any other member of the public. This should not be another case of just the
To Whom it may concern: I am 54 years old and have been an active investor since 1997. During that time I have utilized many different investment vehicles to achieve my investing goals including stocks, bonds, options, mutual funds, etfs, leveraged etfs, and even inverse etfs. It was with great disappointment to learn that federal regulators are considering restricting individual investors
It is unbelievable that you would wish to attempt to place such restrictions on these trading vehicles. These have been available for many years and I personally have used these in my trading strategies to manage risk. We are all fully aware of the volatility associated with leveraged funds. These present no greater danger than supposedly save bonds
SEC Approves Amendments to Rules Governing Communications With the Public
Greetings,
I run a systematic quarterly rebalancing plan that is powered by leveraged ETFs. I know what I am doing, understand the risks (and benefits), and as such, the proper use of these leveraged products is a key part of my financial plan.
These funds are important to my plan; they improve my performance over the long haul. I am not engaged in reckless trading. I understand the effect of
To Whom It May Concern:
I am strongly opposed to any restriction to on my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These funds are great innovations that have been extremely helpful in hedging my regular investments since they became available. Loss of these products would expose me to a higher level of risk. Independent entities are at a disadvantage vis a vis institutions in all social
To Whom It May Concern,
It is only right that I not regulators be the one to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family!
Public investments should always without fail be available to the public for myself and my family and others like us. And shouldn't be just for the privileged.
Going through any special processes really shouldn't become a reality
To The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
I'm disappointed to learn you are considering measures to prevent or restrict my choice to purchase complex products. Even though they are a small piece of my portfolio, they are very important. They provide a hedge to balance my portfolio and reduce risk. They also outperform most of my portfolio on a short term allowing me to increase
To whom it may concern, Instead of regulators choosing which investments I can and can't use, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public. I shouldn't have to go through any special process before you can invest in public securities. If a product is complicated, there are already rules
As an American and a vetran U S Army officer, I oppose restrictions to my right to invest for myself. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public