SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementAdvertisingLegal & ComplianceMutual FundTradingTraining
Executive Summary
The NASD is publishing this Notice to inform members of the terms and conditions of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff no-action letter recently issued to the Chubb Securities Corporation (the Chubb letter), which sets forth the SEC's policy on broker/
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Legal & Compliance
Operations
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
Effective January 1, 1999, the maximum Small Order Execution SystemSM (SOESSM) order sizes for 476 Nasdaq National Market® (NNM) securities will be revised in accordance with National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD®) Rule 4710(g).
For more information, please contact
I dont agree with adding restrictions on public investments. I like having a variety of fund vehicles that allow me to tailor different parts of my family portfolio to best align with our plans. I am planning to use some of these vehicles to hedge retirement withdrawals, so we won't be hammered by reverse-dollar-cost-averaging. New restrictions will not prevent irresponsible individuals
1. Disciplinary sanctions should be designed to protect the investing public by deterring misconduct and upholding high standards of business conduct.
The purpose of FINRA's disciplinary process is to protect the investing public, support and improve the overall business standards in the securities industry, and decrease the likelihood of recurrence of misconduct by the disciplined
As an investor I have the authority to choose my own investments, make investment decisions and leverage these tools to protect my investments in a way I see fit. No regulator can speak for me or understand my priorities nor do they know what assets I own or the my strategy to protect my investments or trade in the markets. Regulators deciding what is a complex product is far too vague and it
I oppose any effort to restrict access to leveraged or inverse trading tools or ETFs
I am fully capable of educating myself on the risks and I see no value to the government interference in my private investment choices.
leveraged and inverse funds play an important role in my risk management strategies.
leveraged etfs allow me to take properly hedge and balance my trading accounts and my more
Dear FINRA Regulatory panel,
Herewith I want to let you know I Veto any restrictions in regards to trading any kind of assets in the public domain with any company offering inverse funds, high yield bond funds or any other offered funds of any kind.
I am well aware in regards to fund or stock trading for more then 20 years.
I belief it should be to the choice of an individual how, when, what to
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to you because I received a notice that I will be restricted to buy leveraged fund. I do not quite understand this decision because I am clear about what I am doing and understand the risk behind it.
Public investment should be available for everyone as long as they follow the rules and do not violate any regulations. I believe I have the rights to buy any
Dear FINRA Regulators,
I wish to weigh in on the deliberations regarding leveraged ETFs and complex products. As a retail investor who is managing my own portfolio, these products provide significant flexibility and opportunity to appropriately manage both reward risk related to market volatility. Additionally, when constructing a portfolio or adjusting it based on economic assumptions and
I--not you or other regulatory authorities--should be able to choose the investments suitable to me. Attempts to regulate and limit access to leveraged and inverse funds only harm equal opportunity and equality and do not level the playing field for investors. Requiring investors to meet certain requirements before accessing these products is a violation of liberty and the American way of life.
