More regulations no sirs. There are to many now that limit the small investors like me that contribute to the benefit of our economy and others retirements. With out this type of strategy available I will be pushed out of your system and take my money elsewhere . I am putting up with your current rules because I still feel I can get ahead with out risking it all. I feel the majority of people in
I am strongly opposed to these restrictions being considered for leveraged and inverse funds.
Regulators should not be able to restrict or limit public investments that are right for me and my family.
Restrictions like passing a test before I can invest in public securities such as leveraged and inverse funds are unnecessary. I am quite capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and
I should be able to choose any public investment, without regulators controlling my ability to invest! Restricting investment opportunities, for only the privileged and already high net worth individuals is entirely unfair and does not bode well for our free market.
If an investor is capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds they should be allowed to invest as they wish and take on
The government cannot even manage their own money, they definitely should not be telling me how to manage mine. Only I know what kind of risks I am willing to take and how much I can afford to invest in risky investments.
I have been investing for over 30 years, I do not want or need regulators putting me through a special process to allow me to manage MY money in any way I see fit! It is MY
It is important that the pending increased regulation of "complex products" is not passed or put into place by FINRA.
Products deemed as such as used by investors such as myself after careful study, constitute a very small portion of my or my family office's net worth/liquidity, but present a vital tool in risk managment and/or achieving more beta in certain investing
I am writing to oppose any further regulation on leveraged and inverse investment products. Individual investors like myself have access to prospectus documents, we can read how the product operates, and we know that all investments in the stock and bond markets come with risks. Who is clamoring for this regulation, besides regulators? You might prevent 1% of investors from making a mistake, but
To the FINRA board, I strongly believe that I should have the right to choose in what I get to invest in. Publicly traded companies should not be regulated or restricted to the American public. It's not fair that giant corporations or the supremely wealthy have more flexibility and power to play this game, where the common American has to try and get by in this world and one way to do
Sirs, I have been made aware of some potential changes in how I might trade equities. I am a retired physician, with no formal training in finance. However, I have trained myself rigorously in order to successfully trade securities and maintain and grow my investments. I rely on many leveraged and inverse funds to hedge my long term investments and manage risk, to acquire income for cost of
I wholly and completely oppose any and all regulation that will take away from my ability to manage my finances in a manner that is appropriate to my level of comfort concerning risk and returns. Retail investors do not need to be saved from themselves. The proposed rules being considered are a simple tactic aiming to keep the rich, rich and the the poor, poor.
This proposal will take the
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the investments that are right for me. Investments should be available to all of the public, not just the elite.
I shouldnt have to go through special processes, like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and inverse