Displaying 7291 - 7300 of 34836 Results
I oppose the restrictions that are being considered to invest in leveraged and/or inverse funds. I've been investing for many decades and I'm aware of the risks associated with such funds and if/when I choose to invest in them, then it should be my right to do so without any special process.
There are so many things wrong with this proposal:
-it discriminates against people based on income
-it's elitist
-it incorrectly assumes more financial education leads to better outcomes. Which is why the vast majority of investment firms under perform the market.
-unless this is announced to happen years ahead of time, it will cause people in these funds to be blind sided by the
People can buy or invest in whatever they want, stop trying to control everyone and everything. LEAVE THE CRYPTO CURRENCY SPACE ALONE!
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
To Whom it may concern: I am 54 years old and have been an active investor since 1997. During that time I have utilized many different investment vehicles to achieve my investing goals including stocks, bonds, options, mutual funds, etfs, leveraged etfs, and even inverse etfs. It was with great disappointment to learn that federal regulators are considering restricting individual investors
Leveraged and Inverse ETFs are very important for portfolio construction. Leveraged inverse ETFs are an inexpensive way to hedge a portfolio. For example, I was hedged with SPXS and SQQQ in March 2020. As a result, my portfolio did not go down as much as other people I know, and I wasn't stampeded out of the market. I held on and the market righted itself. Without leveraged inverse ETFs
I have 30 years of investment experience, and my strategy is conservative. I use leveraged and inverse funds as a hedge, and understand the risk of maintaining these holdings over an extended period of time. My investment in these funds never exceeds 3% of my portfolio.
with almost 50 years of investing and advanced degrees and a CHFC certificate to boot, i really enjoy having to sit for a test by someone who has no idea what is my situation. adds delays to investing that may be costly. millions of people are waiting for refunds for the past few years. not enough staff to process and old computers systems etc. how will this bad system be any better. waste of
I believe that the FINRA is overstepping it's authority with these proposed regulations. People who invest know the risks and do not need these unnecessary obligations.
It is my belief that a market should be open and fair and that each market participant regardless of funds or experience should be able to have access to the same tools and be able to take on whatever risk they feel comfortable with. By denying some investors access to products and not others, you are creating a two tier system which is the antithesis of a free market. You are also giving one