Displaying 7301 - 7310 of 34836 Results
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not
need these measures imposed on me.
Three times leveraged funds have in detail the risks involved with investing in them. Investors should be able to make their own decisions on what they put their money in without the guidance or approval of any government entity. Quite frankly, it completely oversteps any authority given to a government entity via the constitution and should ultimately not even be considered. do not regulate
The only people that these restrictions would benefit would be wealthy individuals with inside information. The Pelosi's have enough money. Stop stacking the system against people like me. Oh, by the way ... I vote.
We want to choose our investments the way we want - not you. We don't want to go through any special processes or test so we can invest in the type of investments we want - we are capabe of knowing what we or understand what we like when it comes to the type of leverage and inverse funds we want. They are important strategies of investments for us and we take them into consideration
I adamantly oppose any regulations that would restrict or prevent my right to invest my money how I see fit. It is my responsibility to choose investments, which may include some public investments, as a part of my overall portfolio, and those that would best suit my financial goals.
I use these tools in my investment portfolio. The regulations would absolutely make my families life harder, along with millions of others.
With basic research, one can fully understand the risk that they are taking on. It is up to the investor, not regulators, to ensure they are making prudent decisions.
These regulations will hurt the value of these longstanding products, thus incurring
I am against imposing regulations on my ability to invest in inverse and leveraged funds. I have invested in such funds and realize the risk involved and understand the basics of how they work. Imposing regulations on these funds sets a very very dangerous precedent. What will you regulate next? I don't need some government bureaucracy trying to protect me from myself. That is NOT the role
I do not appreciate regulators restricting my choices of what I can invest in by making arbitrary rules.
As an individual, I learned that prior to investing in securities, I had to invest in my own financial education first, including risks associated with leveraged and inverse funds. Instead of making it more cumbersome to invest, consider helping and making it easier so younger generations may
FINRA Regulators:
While I understand the concern of heightened risk posed by leveraged securities, I am alarmed at the proposed measures restricting investment into these publicly traded leveraged securities, especially requirements related to net worth, because these types of investments allow the type of returns necessary for lower net worth individuals to attain financial success, and
I have been using leveraged and inverse funds as a primary part of my trading strategy for 4 years now. The instruments do present risk to traders but investing is a risky endeavor, the risk of the products are documented, and these are adults choosing to trade using the instruments. Taking the options away, limits options for investors to manage their own risk/reward level. Much of the market is