Dear Sirs;
Im beside myself over the thought that regulators would want to prevent me or anyone from investing as I see fit for myself and my family. I should be able to invest as I see fit. Public investments should be freely available to all without restrictions and not only for the privileged.
No one should have to go through any special process, such as passing an exam before you can invest
Did you know discretionary trading in your account is allowed, but only if you've authorized a broker to do so and the broker’s firm has approved it?
To Whom It May Concern:
I strongly believe that we investors, rather than regulators, should be able to choose the public investment options that are right for us and our family. And all kinds of public investments should be available to all the investors, not just the privileged ones. USA is a democratic country, which ensures equal investment opportunities and rights for all investors.
Various
Please do not restrict any of the leveraged funds access as I use these funds in an intelligent manner and follow the signal system method ( jason kelly sig system )of buying and selling these funds every quarter based on past performances . These funds can be volitile but when used in a systematic mathematical system they are very rewarding as they just follow the index or commodity . I have
Comments: I am a small, (60K portfolio) non-commercial investor, approaching retirement, and I believe FINRA's attempts to require enhancements to current rules on Leveraged and Inverse ETFs (L&I Funds) unnecessarily limits investor choice. Such ETFs are an essential part of my portfolio. FINRA adoption of a more restrictive stance on non-commercial investors ability to buy
I have been investing in ETF's for the past 20 years, and I have made significant profits toward my retirement from these particular funds. Removing the ability for the retail investor to hold and trade these funds would severely unduly limit the average investor from profiting the same as the establishment and professional traders, which would be discriminatory and and unfair. We are
I am writing to state my opposition to any new rules (Notice #22-08) which would restrict my ability as an individual investor to use many of the investment products available, including leveraged and inverse investment products. I believe that the job of FINRA should be to assure us that the products are soundly constructed and to insure that the risks associated with their use are adequately
I would like to take a moment to let you know that It should be up to me as an individual to make my own decisions to use investment vehicles I see fit for my investment strategies.
Inverse and leveraged funds can be used to protect my investments from down turns or sentiment changes in the markets. It is important that these products remain available and easy to access without undue
I would urge you not to place any new restrictions on leveraged ETF products. I am a retail investor and am interested in investing in these products for a small part of my portfolio as part of a high risk / high reward investment. Leveraged strategies have been used by large institutional and high net worth investors for some time and leveraged ETFs democratize access to them. It isn't
Gentle ladies and Gentlemen, I hope you do not prevent investors from using various forms of ETF's, structured funds, and all the other forms of investment vehicles that some of us like to use to protect and enhance our portfolios. Speaking for myself only, because I cannot speak for all the other market participants as there are too many and they have areas of expertise that I don&#