Displaying 3281 - 3290 of 9026 Results
I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities
I have been investing in leveraged and inverse funds for well over a decade and am very happy with my results. I do not believe I need to take a test so that I can invest in these funds nor do I believe one should have millions of dollars before being allowed to use these instruments. They are important to my overall investment strategy in order to enhance my returns as well as to hedge other
In FINRA staff’s survey of quantum computing use cases, several firms indicated that they are examining how they can benefit from quantum computers when conducting various activities, including trade execution, portfolio management, risk assessments and fraud detection.34 Additional firms indicated to FINRA that they are assessing the potential risk quantum computers may pose to current
Leveraged investments are a key part of my investment strategies. Especially leveraged ETFs are a critical component of hedging risk to manage risk adjusted returns in my portfolios. There are no other effective hedges available for small investors. I have a clear understanding of the volatility and of the risks.
I'm actually more surprised the governments doesn't propose
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am more than capable of understanding leveraged and
I have the ability to make my own sound investments and do not need regulators to say otherwise. Additionally, I don't need to take a test or read documents to understand the risks I take when making investments in leveraged or inverse funds. These inverse and leveraged investments are an important part of my investment strategy to hedge against market volatility to the downside so that
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I assist my retired mom via dividend income investing to supplement her SS benefits, and your contemplated imposition of restrictions to invest would, in practice, forbid me from investing on her behalf because she would not be able to pass those tests on her own.
This year, I used leveraged and inverse funds for my mother's account and met her financial objective. If these tools are
I support FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08. Complex investment scheme should be limited as they're deemed to be highly risky for lay person. Greedy broker and fund investors take high commissions and fees while tricking people those funds are in high yield.
For people would like to invest, they NEED:
Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge
Demonstrate a
I, myself not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am plenty capable of understanding