I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I also shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
such as leveraged and inverse funds. I am aware of the risks of these investments. I don
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not be forced to go through a specific test to be able to trade any securities I want. As an individual I am capable of making my own decisions. Cryptocurrency strategy is important for my long term financial planning
I disagree with your proposed regulation to restrict the purchase of leveraged and inverse funds and dozens of other popular investments deemed to be complex unless you:
Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge
Demonstrate a high net worth
Get special approval from your broker
Attest to reading certain materials
Go through cooling off periods during which
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST ON LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged
So I have used leveraged and inverse ETFs for approximately 10 years as a way to channel my investing when I believe a certain segment of the market has been oversold/overbought. Further, I may use them to hedge my existing positions. I believe it's my right to choose these investments as I see fit without having to pass some artifical test. After all, the firms that I trade with have their
Hello People: I am disturbed that you are wanting to strictly regulate many types of public investments, and, in my case, inverse funds, to name one. I am a 73 year-old single woman, and I have been investing my IRAs and brokerage accounts for decades. It is unnecessary for me to submit to testing or training, as I understand the securities I invest in. I have invested in an inverse fund only a
I strongly oppose any restrictions on my right to decide what I can and cannot invest in. I currently invest in 2X or 3X products, both bullish and bearish. I am a grown adult, with 30 years of experience in the markets and do not need additional protection from regulators. I take personal responsibility for my decisions and would prefer that you leave me alone to invest how I prefer. I find
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST My education - a Ph.D. from a university in the U.S. and mathematics as my Bachelor Degree's minor subject, I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I - not regulators - should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like taking a test
I have been active investor for over 20 years and have successfully managed my SEP IRA and investment accounts during that time. I should not be required to take any tests to invest in any stocks including leveraged and inverse funds. In particular, leveraged and inverse funds allow me to take advantage opportunities using less capital as well as hedge risk. Please do not restrict and/or make it
I vehemently oppose this proposed regulation. It is my RIGHT to choose which investments are appropriate for me. Regulators are not elected by ME to make choices for me. As a person with a degree in Finance and work experience with a Wall St. bank, I should not be required to pass any test that a bureaucratic regulator writes. Members of the public who use their funds in such investments are not
