FINRA Regulatory Notice 25-05 and Proposed Rule 3290 - I'm writing to strenuously object to the adoption of this rule as being oppressive and a major step back in the bureau's efforts to be more pro-business and progressive. I deal with several advisers that would be negatively impacted by the adoption of 3290. This would cause them to leave their firms as I don't believe they would sell their holdings, I know I wouldn't and don't want them to. I'm not eager to find new advisors either.

I oppose Rule 3290. It is serious over reach into both the professional and personal lives of Financial Advisors. As I read elsewhere, this is akin to not allowing Real Estate Agents and there families from owning a home.

Do not pass this rule!

Please oppose this archaic proposal. The old system is in need of modernization. Crypto is a reality, will not be stopped.

5/5/2025

Ms. Jennifer Piorko Mitchell Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA

1735 K Street

Washington, DC 20006

Re: Request for Comment on Regulatory Notice 25-05

Dear Ms. Mitchell,

Please don't do this, it's stupid and regressive.

the US needs to take the leed as far as crypto innovation. This is not it.

I want to express my strong opposition to FINRA’s Proposed Rule 3290. As a an investor who personally owns digital assets and utilizes a registered advisor, I am deeply concerned about the proposed restrictions requiring financial advisors to seek approval from their broker/dealer before engaging in personal crypto asset investments.

This rule should be opposed. The only way to KNOW crypto is to hold crypto. This is stupid. No boomer from JPM is going to understand utility coins.

This is a poorly written proposal and i disagree with much of the content. Please do not pass this.

this would go against all progression we’ve made in the industry and stifle innovation further. This is not what we need to succeed in the crypto space.