Public securities are just that, "Public". And, if crypto related public securities are having special testing/restrictions being placed on the security in advance of the investor choice, this is an undue and illegal method to reduce investor interest or involvement in the related security.
To the SEC: Do not restrict access to investment in cryptocurrencey related securities.
Dear Regulator(s), Kindly requesting you to reconsider the imposing investment restrictions to individual investors. I am in no position to analyze full picture of why considering such rule and what future impact will be for US investors. However, customers move away from companies that are not prioritizing and addressing customers real need and within parameters these parameters I can imagine
I have been investing in leveraged and inversed funds, as one of my strategies, for over twenty years and have a very good understanding of my investments. Now, with your proposed rule, you are taking away my freedom to select how I invest in a well respected investment selection. If you want to control, which you seem to want to do, go after crypto, because it is going to cost investors big time
This notification is to warn member firms of an ongoing phishing campaign that involves fraudulent emails purporting to be from FINRA and using either the domain name “@finra.eu” and “@finrarec.com”. Samples of both emails are provided in Appendices 1 and 2.
The domains of “finra.eu” and “finrarec.com” are not connected to FINRA, and member firms or their customers may receive similar phishing
I am absolutely oppose limitations on my ability to invest in ANY equities whether they be leverage/inverse, crypto, volatility-linked funds or any other instrument that I am able to freely invest in today.
If you want investors to limit their risks in any investment, ensure that brokers have educational materials on their websites when someone attempts to buy into what might be considered higher
Hi,
I've always taken personal responsibility for my retirement account and investments. I don't want to have to rely on others for my financial future that I've worked hard to secure. I really appreciate the ability to access and use complex financial tools in the form of simple trading instruments. I use leveraged, inverse and crypto funds regularly for trying to
The proposed rules are completely ridiculous since the United States is far behind the developed world and any kind of blockchain or cryptocurrency regulation the United States must 1st establish procedural laws and regulations around crypto that provide clear guidance to the citizens on how they can invest in and own cooker occurrences and cooked occurrences depending on the type should not even
In regards to regulations in investing, this regulation takes away the right of people to make profit in the market whether they lose it all or dont thats on them for not doing their due diligence. I think its unconstitutional and goes against the very premise of crypto currency purposes. I think this displays a capitalistic disportionately by leveraging power to people and limits any
I feel that the move to restrict access to leveraged and inverse funds is a wrong one. Such a restriction would devoid the retail investor from access to quality instruments that could be significantly beneficial. Several academic studies have underlined the importance of leverage. The LifeCycle Investment from Yale is one such example. These leveraged and inverse funds provide a simple option
I am writing to let you know that I oppose governing of my rights to pick what I invest in or do not invest in. There should not be tests I need to take to invest or things I need to do other than my own education of any investments that I want to invest in. Public investments should be available to anyone who is willing to learn and not be limited by people who already have more money than
