Publick investment shukd be available to all of the public.Privileged don't need as much to suplement there retirement account as working people. I shoudldin't have to go through any specjal process like passing a test bifore I can invest in publick securitiefs, like leverage and invers funds. There are help on for people who want to learn how to invest in leveraged and inverse fund.
As an adult, I don't need protection from "myself". I have my own ideas of how and where to invest my "earnings". Rhetorically speaking, do you regulate casinos, lotteries or any other gambling activities where millions of dollars are spent foolishly by people who actually think they are investing in a payout? Conversely, do you make suggestions of
In no, way, fashion shape or form does the government have any business telling investors whether they are 'permitted' to invest in any investment and this includes but is not limited to:
1). the regulators have no business telling me what I can or cannot invest in. this is way to much control on their part.
2). I shouldn't have to prove I can invest by going thru
I am absolutely oppose limitations on my ability to invest in ANY equities whether they be leverage/inverse, crypto, volatility-linked funds or any other instrument that I am able to freely invest in today.
If you want investors to limit their risks in any investment, ensure that brokers have educational materials on their websites when someone attempts to buy into what might be considered higher
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need
Regulators should NOT be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I am very opposed to any scrutiny or special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding investments I make and their risks. I do not need, and strongly
I am strongly against this proposed regulation change.
I believe that I'm smart enought to
(A) Not invest more than can afford to lose.
(B) Do my due diligence and do thorough investigation into investments BEFORE investing.
I also feel that it should be up to me to decide what public investments I do or do not invest in.
I don't believe that it would be in the publics best
I oppose Restrictions to my "Right To Invest".
1. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me & my family. Not only privileged but every citizen have right to Public Investments.
2. Leveraged and inverse funds are very important to my investments as they help protect(hedge) my investments as well as seek better returns when used as a
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I should not regulators be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I am capable of understanding
