I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I strongly oppose the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), that we may not be able to buy leveraged and inverse funds and dozens of other popular investments deemed to be complex unless we: Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge Demonstrate a high net worth Get special approval from your broker Attest to reading
I am a self taught trader. I learned everything about trading on my own . The most important factors in the trading investment landscape that would help me succeed are the ability to have a large choice and variety of etfs including leveraged etfs . I do not want restrictions or means testing on what etfs I can or cannot buy or sell. This would reduce liquidity as well as consumer choice . I
I am more than able to choose what investments and type of securities are right for me, not you! Public securities should be available to ALL and not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I oppose restrictions to my rights to invest. I believe Americans have the right to trade any public investments with no limitation or restrictions. I, not the regulators should be able to chose the investments that are right for me. I shouldnt have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I do not need those
Comments:
Hi team, good evening! So Im not opposed to new regulations but I am against the average investor or individual not being able to purchase these type of securities altogether. Ive made money actively trading and monitoring leveraged etfs in the past. I do agree there should be more info passed along and perhaps a test of some sort and/or a threshold in the account on perhaps what an
We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Regulators do no need these measures imposed on us. We not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public
I oppose regulatory limitations on my ability to manage my investments
DO NOT pass a regulator-imposed test of MY specialized investment knowledge
DO NOT require that I Demonstrate a high net worth
DO NOT require that I get special approval from my broker
DO NOT require that I attest to reading certain materials
DO NOT require that I Go through cooling off periods where I cant invest
It is my
I feel strongly that I should not have to prove to anyone that I am capable of choosing my own investments. Such a restriction would prevent me from using inverse ETFs to hedge during downtrends in the market (such as we are currently experiencing) and also prevent me from taking advantage of downtrends in the market. Cooling off periods may expose me to a complete inability to protect my money
I am a public investor, I opposed restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds because: - Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged, I am not a regulator, I am one of the public, so I should have the right being able to choose any public investments; - I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I should not have to go
