I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I'm am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, NOT regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities.
I use leveraged and inverse funds to diversify my portfolio in ways that order public
I have been trading leveraged and inverse funds for some time now and should remain to be allowed to do so without further qualification. I am aware of the risk involved and, as a responsible investor, should not be subject to special tests or requirements to trade in these vehicles other than being aware of the risks involved. I do not think my access should be limited from any particular
MSRB Rules G-12 and G-14
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Executive Representatives Legal & Compliance Senior Management
MSRB Rules G-12 MSRB Rules G-14 Transaction Reporting
Executive Summary
NASD reminds member firms about the obligations imposed by Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) Rules G-12 and G-14, particularly the requirement that member firms report their
I strongly oppose regulators deciding whether or not I can invest in public securities. I am well educated and have been an investor for a great number of years. I am perfectly capable of understanding risk factors and how to use these funds as a limited part of my portfolio to hedge/protect my investments. I should be able to make my own decision about what strategy is right for me. I do not
I object to government regulators deciding what I can and cannot do with my investable funds. I receive a prospectus when I buy products that require them, and the burden is on me to make an informed decision. I do not want to have to take any special courses or pass any tests or explain my reasoning to someone outside my family. I have an investment advisor with whom I can discuss whether
I feel that your proposed regulations are insultingly presumptuous. I alone will prosper or suffer from my investments. I dont need interference in my choices. I have been handling investments for many years and have done quite well. I can handle complex instruments, and more importantly I know my limits. I include leveraged or inverse funds when and only when I am comfortable that they are
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before to invest in public securities, like leveraged funds. I am capable of
I oppose restrictions on my investment opportunities. I am a normal "retail" investor and not affiliated with any finanical institution. I have been able to educate myself and understand the risks of "complex" products such as those being considered for these regulations. I should not have to pass any "test", at most only sign/check an
Absolutely absurd and that its being proposed that regular people should have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
People are perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. The last thing we need is more government interference. If anything we should be eliminating the option for anyone in government
