I TOTALLY oppose restrictions to my right to invest! Just like freedom of speech, government isn't to be stopping freedom to invest! I know what is risky or not! I'm NOT stupid! I've been investing in leveraged funds for over ten years and doubled my HSA Medical account! Just think what little Medical funds I would have available with the government intervening. It
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Continuing Education
Institutional
Operations
Registered Representatives
Systems
Trading
Training
To ensure that members fully comply with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 11Ac1-1 (Rule 11Ac1-1 or the firm quote rule), NASD Regulation, Inc., has developed an automated surveillance system (
I recent got the citizenship. In the civic test I learn that the freedom is one of the core value of American. I should have the freedom of choose what public investments I want and take the risk I am willing to take. This should include the inverse funds. The inverse funds is a very important in my portfolio. I have long term investment which are regular funds. But at a high position, instead of
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I
Since this is a free country (USA) we should be able to make our own choices for investments. I do not need someone to test me to see if I am capable of understanding these risks. In fact I have purchased some of these and have been restricted from further purchases when I have tried to average down thereby locking in bigger losses rather than turning them into profits. They will go up and why
As a professional investor, I should be able to choose to invest in public funds and what's suitable for my investments. I use these inversed and leveraged funds to hedge my investments, I shouldn't have to go through any special process, like a test in order to invest in these public funds. I understand the risk involved in investing in leveraged and inverse funds, I do not
I strongly believe that I, and not any regulator, have the right to choose what investments are suitable for me and my family. Publicly available investments need to be accesible to all and not to only a few.
I do not believe that special vetting or testing is in order. Leveraged funds and their risks are clearly explained in all materials.
I use these funds in my portfolio to fulfill specific
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investment suitable for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing. This is no different from a poll literacy tax. We are intelligent enough to know and understand the risk of any investment.
A succession plan is vital to ensuring the continued success of your firm. Join FINRA staff and industry panelists as they discuss considerations for developing a succession plan that works for your business.
Regulators should not prohibit access to valuable investment tools that are designed to serve investors in achieving their goals, including retirement. Investors are responsible for choosing the proper investments for themselves and that SHOULD NOT require any measures imposed on investors that would require testing or minimum net worth requirements. Inverse and Leveraged ETF's are valuable
