Displaying 3241 - 3250 of 9026 Results
To whom it may concern. As a private investor, I should have the ability to choose investments that are right for me, and my family.... not the regulator!
Going through special processes such as a test BEFORE I can invest in public security such as leveraged and inverse funds, is limiting my freedom as an American citizen.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies for me
I stand firm that I should be able to choose the vehicles I invest in. I am an individual investor who has successfully traded using leveraged and inverse funds for many years. Hearing the cautions beforehand, I researched them on my own before I started using them. I currently use them to enhance my portfolio, as well as hedge it. I, and millions of other investors, are capable of understanding
I strongly object to the idea that an investor must go through a special process (like passing a test, special approval, etc.) in order to invest in public traded investments. Leveraged funds are important to my investment strategies. It allows for methods to hedge against losses and take advantage of opportunities created by these types of instruments. Currently there are protocols in place that
I oppose to restrictions on my right to invest. What is more difficult, having the business acumen to evaluate when to buy or sell individual stocks or the wisdom to know that if the stock market generally goes up over time, that you might make more money in a leveraged index fund like the double Nasdaq or double S&P. Are you going to tell me I can't approve of a complex
I have held these type of investments in my portfolio for many years.These funds are a limited percentage of my portfolio. However, they have enhanced my bottom line significantly. Regulators have absolutely no business restricting me on my investment decisions. What makes you think that you can make better financial decisions than I can? Further, I make all of my own investment choices and
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I believe as a middle class citizen that I have the right to invest in funds. Public investments should be available to all not just the privileged.
Leveraged funds provide a hedge against inflation. Which is at a already high rate as it is now. I personally use them only for a small portion of my portfolio but I can see the use of them greatly. However, yes I do see there risk. As with an
I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities
Hello,
I am an investor of 40+ years experience, and regularly use leveraged investment products in my investment strategy. In order to reduce my portfolio risk, I thoroughly studied the various aspects of these products before entering my first position, and am confident that I am capable of using these products without any manner of over sight, testing, or restriction.
I value the opportunity
Dear Sir:
I am writing you to oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
I should be able to choose the public available investments that right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I an