I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. Public investments should be available to everybody, not just the 1% and other elites. I am an adult and am capable of understanding the risks involved with investments, and should be free to place my money in investments if I so choose - there should be no special hoops or processes like passing a financial literacy test
Hello!
My name is Jillian Cardona. I live, work and study in the state if Texas. Im a full time college student and work full time. I dont think I should have to pass a special test just to invest. By restricting the peoples right to invest, it will only cause more upset in the American People. There are many good things about living in the United States, like having the freedom of investing.
I believe that I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged individuals and families.
I understand leveraged funds and the risks. I see no need for tests before being able to invest in these funds, nor more measures to impede my options to invest.
I use these types of funds
Regulators,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds are important to my investment strategies and represent a very limited part of my overall financial portfolio. These funds help me hedge my investments.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a select few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I am not only highly interested in buying any crypto currency in existence, but already involved in crypto as an investment. There should be no special process like passing a test, to invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I am fully capable of understanding cryptocurrency funds such as BITO and their risks.There should be no measures imposed on me, and anyone
I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies and are a limited part of my
This data provides total and average daily trading volumes for the prior month in corporate, agency and securitized products reported to TRACE. Learn more about corporate, agency and other bonds.
The data is grouped into "Total," "ATS” (Alternative Trading System), ”Interdealer" and "Dealer-to-Customer" categories.
The data is published on the third business day
Retail investor like me should have the equal right to choose in public investment like leveraged/inverse ETF as it is very important investment strategy for me. I should not have to go through the special process like passing test. As long as I understand the risk and agree to willing to take risk, I should be able to do it. If this right of mine is going to taken away due to high risk of
I want to choose my investments and NOT have regulators restrict me. I do not want them "protecting" me. Let me take my own risks. I am a financial professional and don't want to take any test to "qualify me". If I lose my investment, I will not be looking for a bail out. It is my responsibility to assess my own risks. The only exception is if
I am strongly opposed to the proposed regulations on leveraged and inverse funds. Limiting investments like this based on net worth is discriminatory (probably racially discriminatory, whether that is intended or not) and will only further stratify wealth in America at a time when this is already a significant problem. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my investment strategy.
