TO: All NASD Members
The New York Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission has asked the NASD to provide members with a notice regarding the activities of Gerald Greenspan outlined below.
Mr. Greenspan was permanently enjoined by the United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.) from further violations of the federal securities laws in 1960, 1975 and 1980. The 1980 injunction requires
Dear SEC I am appalled by your recent proposal to restrict investment in leveraged and inverse ETFs to investors with a high net worth. Particularly inverse ETFs are one the few convenient ways that smaller investors presently have to hedge their risk against a bear market. By restricting these funds to the very wealthy, your rule's primary outcome will be that high net worth investors can
Please don't interfere with these ETF'S that are leveraged. I've made very good money trading TQQQ over the years and for those that just hold it; it's compounded about 49% each year! I hold QQQX because it pays a phenomenal dividend. I also love URTY to capture small caps. There are several of the pro shares I like. Look you can lose money in anything. These last two months I
To Whom It May Concern: I am a self-directed individual investor writing to urge you in the strongest possible terms to avoid creating any new regulatory barriers to investing in leveraged or inverse funds. Your role in upholding basic investor protections is vital to the integrity of the market. While institutional investors can access a variety of financial instruments to take advantage of
Does FINRA only wish to cater to the "RICH CATS" of Wall Street? ETFs are a Godsend to smaller investors, WHOM can NOT open $1 Million + accounts with Goldman Sachs, or Morgan Stanley....and get special privileges (edges) like getting 1st dibs on new IPOs etc. NOW, inverse funds are under review so SMALL fry WILL NOT be allowed to 'short' sectors of the markets? MUST we all
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 ("CFMA") lifted the ban on the trading of security futures, i.e., single stock and narrow-based stock index futures ("security futures"). Because they are subject to regulation both as securities and as futures contracts, security futures must be traded on trading facilities and through intermediaries that are registered with
There needs to be much more clarity, no self reporting, frequent third party analysis, bigger punishmemts for rule breakers. If a HF/MM can earn more than they are fined then its a business cost, they need to be fined double the profit plus face criminal proceedings. As a UK investor, i have everything in the US markets, after the manipulation of Gamestop i have no faith what so ever, even China
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Continuing Education
Legal & Compliance
Training
Executive Summary
On February 8, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved Rule 1120 (formerly Schedule C, Part XII of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., By-Laws) of the NASD® Membership and Registration Rules, which prescribes requirements for
I cannot believe how deep this corruption runs. Honestly, at this point id be hopeful that any number of these committees would do something to level the playong feild here. However judging by lack of action, i have come to one of two conclusions. You're either all corrupt and working together to rob the american public. The people who keep this coubtry running. The people you all considered
I have been investing for a long time now and have seen many of the tricks the large companies use to turn large profits. One of the worst treatments I have witnessed, was the way the CMKX share holders were treated as their company was naked short sold into oblivion. It was later found out that there were millions of naked short transfers out there and when the cert pull happened there were some
