FINRA should not take away rights of retail investors in trading leveraged ETFs. US market is not the only place to invest these days and it might force retail investor to invest more in risky offshore markets. If the leverage ETF investing is taken away from retail investors, it will widen the spread between bid/ask. Not to mention the number of jobs that will be lost in the financial industry.
To Whom It May Concern:
About 5 years ago, I realized that I would need more than my 401(k) funds for retirement. Since then I've added investments in different types of accounts. I've been surprised at roadblocks placed in my way such as forms and required reading simply to enable purchases of inverse ETFs. As an adult putting my money on the line, I will do research to
Regulators should NOT be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I am very opposed to any scrutiny or special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding investments I make and their risks. I do not need, and strongly
I oppose Restrictions to my "Right To Invest".
1. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me & my family. Not only privileged but every citizen have right to Public Investments.
2. Leveraged and inverse funds are very important to my investments as they help protect(hedge) my investments as well as seek better returns when used as a
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
To Whom It May Concern, After learning of the proposed regulations to limit access to leveraged and inverse funds, I am reaching out to make the following known: I believe that as an investor it is my sole responsibility to understand the funds I am investing in. I use leveraged funds as an important part of my portfolio to hedge against certain risks. I do not believe it is right that access to
Its interesting to see how FINRA favors "big money", who causes most of the chaos and wide market swings, over those of whom are considered the (retail investor). Every prospectus lists the risks associated with the particular stock or fund, stating "Investor beware", yet FINRA considers margin and option trading less riskier. Regulators tend to pick the
I should not regulators be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I am capable of understanding
I am strongly opposed to these restrictions being considered for leveraged and inverse funds.
Regulators should not be able to restrict or limit public investments that are right for me and my family.
Restrictions like passing a test before I can invest in public securities such as leveraged and inverse funds are unnecessary. I am quite capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and
I wholly and completely oppose any and all regulation that will take away from my ability to manage my finances in a manner that is appropriate to my level of comfort concerning risk and returns. Retail investors do not need to be saved from themselves. The proposed rules being considered are a simple tactic aiming to keep the rich, rich and the the poor, poor.
This proposal will take the