Hi, I like to have freedom to invest in leveraged and inverse funds without going through tests and additional constraints. I usually do my research on what I'm investing and so knowledgeable enough to make my own independent decisions considering all risks involved. I usually use these funds to hedge my investments or get some higher returns based on their leverage. I want investment
I strongly oppose this measure. People must have the right to freely trade investment products at their own risk and based on their own research. If an individual decides to blindly accept a financial institution/advisor's trading recommendations then that individual could lose significant amounts of money regardless of whether or not leveraged or inverse exchange-traded products are
Large hedge funds, investment banks, the very wealthy have the means to create their own leveraged and inverse investments. By eliminating leveraged and inverse ETF's for the public, regulators would merely be creating another avenue by which the wealthy remain and grow more wealthy and the common investor is barred from that same wealth creating opportunity. Is that the underlying
As an experienced investor who has successfully used leveraged and inverse ETF's in my portfolio for years, I feel they are a useful tool that helps me get the returns I need for a secure future. At times I use inverse ETF's to protect my other investments. At other times I use leverage when risks are low. I don't believe the concepts of leveraged or inverse ETF&#
As a retail investor who does my own homework, I don’t need more regulation from a nongovernmental organization. Using inverse ETFs when I deem them appropriate has helped my retirement funds gain 9% YTD, whereas commonly traded ETFs like SPY, QQQ, and TLT are down 12-20% YTD. Perhaps you’d first like to explain to the Fed that inflation is not “transitory”? Or perhaps explain to them the
Investing on any asset class should be a personal decision. Those investors that do our due diligence to educate ourselves before investing and that may not be considered 'high net worth' should be able to have the same opportunities than 'high net worth' companies and individuals. I understand the risks and time decay of leverage investments and do not need to
Dear Sir:
I am writing you to oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
I should be able to choose the public available investments that right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I an
Although I am opposed to restriction of access to complex investments for anyone, I fully support efforts to ensure that consumers are provided full disclosure in layman's/non-financial-professional terms about the complexities and risks that may effect their investing and investments. Many reputable major brokerages seem to do a decent job of providing investor classification and risk-
I'm writing because I'm invested in funds such as BITO. It has come to my attention that FINRA wants to regulate these in such a way that investors are required to become accredited, pass tests, get special approval, cooling off periods, etc. I disagree with this and believe anyone should be allowed to invest in public securities with their own money, without government scrutiny. Laws
Hello, I am very concerned about your proposed regulations on investing. As I am an adult and a head of household spending my money, I should have the final say on how I invest it. I fully understand the risks of investing and don't need to be tested on the subject. I do not need a cooling off period, because i research investments, and I certainly don't need someone's permission