I have the ability to make my own sound investments and do not need regulators to say otherwise. Additionally, I don't need to take a test or read documents to understand the risks I take when making investments in leveraged or inverse funds. These inverse and leveraged investments are an important part of my investment strategy to hedge against market volatility to the downside so that
I DEPEND on trading leveraged ETFs for my livelihood. In fact, it is my only source of income since I am disabled and unable to work a regular job. If you take away my ability to invest, you take away my ability to survive and earn the necessary income which I need to live. It's that simple. Please STOP trying to "fix" something that isn't broken. Leveraged
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST. I can, on my own w/o any help from more regulations, decide for myself which investments suit me and my family. I do not need any special process before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Tell regulators you do not need these measures imposed
Dear Sir,
I clearly oppose any restrictions on my investment right. I am retired, meaning old enough to understand the risks of investing in leveraged and inverse funds. So, I only invest in those funds with small portion of my total investment amount. Sometimes, I need investment flexibility of leveraged funds, which can be accomplished with smaller amount of money. And, I invest in inverse
Ladies and gentlemen, I urge you to not amend the rules regarding complex investment products like leveraged and inverse ETFs. I am an individual retail investor for whom these products are a necessary tool to manage risk in my portfolio. Many investors use them to hedge.
There exists many safeguards to prevent rampant speculation, and the rules in place as well as the efforts of retail broker
I believe that investors such as myself should continue to have access to L&I ETFs, funds, and including derivatives such as options on such products. They are useful for hedging in the short term and in general i believe that investors should have this choice. The reason is they are far more efficient than trying to take short positions or selling shares in positions where we
I use my own money for my public investments. So I should be able to choose the public investments that align with my financial planning and risk level. I therefore oppose all restrictions to my freedom.
We all need a license to drive, but that's because other people's lives depend upon our driving skills. Investing is different, because only I get affected by my investment
I oppose the restrictions on the public to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I believe every type of investment was created to meet some need of the public, and they should be made available to everyone. Losing free access to financial tools such as leveraged and inverse funds will shut more doors to the poor and make the rich richer. As long as people are able to get disclosures about the
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
It is imperative that America maintains a free and open market for investments of all types. Regulations are to insure fairness in the market, not a strangle hold on freedom of choice. It is important for FINRA to publish articles and guidance to those people interested in investing in certain public securities. Education is the fundamental job of government outlining the risks and rewards of