I, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged
I, shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I you use leverage and
Dear Regulators, I have been invested in leverage and inverted ETF funds as part of my personal and IRA investment account portfolio over the last fifteen years. I found them extremely helpful to be able to invest in a specific market sector to diversify or as a hedge to my position. It can avoid some of the risk of picking a wrong stock. Please do not limit the investors' choice of
This note is written to mention that I have been using the 2x and 3x leveraged ETF's for few years now and fully understand the risk of investing in it. With proper hedging strategies this helps me and my family invest our money effectively. As a personal investor it would be very disappointing if this investment vehicle is removed for us.
I would kindly request to take this into
I use leveraged funds to hedge my accounts in volatile markets. They are a particularly efficient and inexpensive way to do that in a short-term way. Regulations make short-selling as a hedge very difficult and cumbersome; the ability to access leveraged ETFs levels the playing field for retail investors who do not use brokers. I understand the risks and decay of the instruments, but those are
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments, such as leveraged and inverse funds. I should be free to choose these funds doing my own research. It is not fair that only the privileged get to invest in what they want. I have a college education and plenty of other retirement savings. I should be able to make my own calculated risks. I am also willing to attest to that
Dear regulators, Please be advised that I DO NOT WANT any restrictions on these funds. I want to keep the liberty of keeping these funds to invest and trade as freely available as much as any other stocks and ETFs. I completely understand the risk of the market and I do agree of such leveraged and hedge investment ETFs needs to protect as hedged and using as an asset inhancement for my needs for
I have Best disaster in double in triple S&P 500 and NASDAQ in the investments for many years, as a result I have built up a substantial net worth. Taking these investments away from me would greatly reduce my investment returns. So long as people understand what they are buying I see nothing wrong with them. I am fully aware of the risks involved, Ive been through good times and
I am an investor who trades with New York Stock Exchange shares. In order for markets to truly be free and fair, there needs to be a level playing field for all entities involved. This is agnostic of the risks involved. Deviating from that impacts trust as it can be interpreted that retail investors have different rules from other investor entities. I do not support this rule as it's
I firmly believe that any individual, and not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for them and their families.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am