It does not make sense to limit leveraged investments as long as I can get a mortgage for 20% or less down payment in an asset which can lose 50% in the matter of months during a recession. How can that be safer than using leveraged and inverse investments? I'll tell you that it's not, in fact is significantly less safer. What harm is it to limit inverse investments when
The funds prospectus makes it clear what the fund is doing and what you are doing with your money if you decide to invest. Please, do not pursue further regulation of these funds. The funds are performing as designed. Any limitations on such a fund creates yet another barrier for the retail investor to gain access to similar leverage that many more fortunately endowed elites have access to. We
I write ti make clear that I should be allowed, as an investor, to participate in any public investments such as leveraged an inverse funds. These should be available to all investors, not just the wealthy. It should be a level playing field.
I dont need regulations nannying me. Im more than capable of understanding the risks of investing in leveraged and inverse funds.
Leveraged and inverse
Hello. The opportunity to use leveraged funds is essential to me as an average investor who is not ready to play the options market. Nor do I have time to manage options. All investments have risks and, if managed correctly, can provide returns over the proper time horizons. Please dont take the opportunity for average investors to leverage their funds right after the most historic bull market in
To Whom It May Concern, I am appalled by any restrictions made on publicly traded securities, especially targeting the individual investor, like myself. I am fully capable and understand the risk involved in any investment, and should have the liberty to choose where to invest, without restrictions. In times like these, and market instability, leveraged and inverse funds are critical to my
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged
I believe it would be unfortunate if leveraged and inverse funds would cease to be available to all investors because they are very effective tools for hedging risk and pursue enhanced returns in the construction of a balanced portfolio.
The availability of pre-packaged instruments like inverse and leveraged funds empowers investors, small and large, with tools that would otherwise only be
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged
I, shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I you use leverage and
Dear Regulators, I have been invested in leverage and inverted ETF funds as part of my personal and IRA investment account portfolio over the last fifteen years. I found them extremely helpful to be able to invest in a specific market sector to diversify or as a hedge to my position. It can avoid some of the risk of picking a wrong stock. Please do not limit the investors' choice of