MUST KEEP MARKETS FREE AND OPEN.OR ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE BUSINESSES MOVE, THIS INABILITY TO OPERATE AND BUY AND SELL COMPLETELY TAXLESS WHAT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY NEEDS TO STOP. BY TRYING TO CONTROL THIS YOUR KILLING A VERY GOLDEN GOOSE WHICH EXPANDS EVERYONES CAPACITY TO HAVE A BIGGER PIECE OF A BIGGER PIE
EVERYONE WINS BY TAKING TAXATION OUT OF ALL CRYPTO EQUATIONS, WE PAY ANY INTEREST TROUGH A
Enough with the restrictions, I should be able to choose which segments I wish to invest in. Data is todays new form of currency and Crypto related segments are 1) tech driven, 2) tied to trove of data 3) at a min a Fund like BITO is managed so the diversification is built in even though its a speculative emerging market.
If you start limiting these things then why let investors invest with
Cryptocurrency and crypto currency funds should not be limited to qualified investors. It is the duty of all investors to understand the what they are investing in and the risks involved. Closing off retail investors from an entire class of assets would be a disservice and over reach. As this sector of the economy grows and evolves it is on all of those investing to research and understand what
In response to the threat of regulations regarding cryptocurrency, I would like to say any regulations enforced equals freedom weakened or even loss. Our government needs to downsize , as it is too big and wasteful. Crypto is NOT property of the government nor does it compete to acquire the next bitcoin like the bitcoin miners do. It is a code generated by the blockchain as a reward for
I do not appreciate the government telling me what the right investments are for my family. I also do not like the government making one set of rules for the middle class and another for high net worth individuals on wall street. Please leave crypto investing alone, there were 85,000 new millionaires from cryptocurrency alone last year and I like to invest in worthwhile projects in that space.
Regulators should stay out of choosing what types of publicly traded investments are right for market participants.
Public investments should be available to all market participants, not those deemed "worthy" by regulators.
No one should have to take a test in order to trade a leveraged or inverse ETF.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important for portfolio strategy,
Public securities are just that, "Public". And, if crypto related public securities are having special testing/restrictions being placed on the security in advance of the investor choice, this is an undue and illegal method to reduce investor interest or involvement in the related security.
To the SEC: Do not restrict access to investment in cryptocurrencey related securities.
Dear Regulator(s), Kindly requesting you to reconsider the imposing investment restrictions to individual investors. I am in no position to analyze full picture of why considering such rule and what future impact will be for US investors. However, customers move away from companies that are not prioritizing and addressing customers real need and within parameters these parameters I can imagine
I have been investing in leveraged and inversed funds, as one of my strategies, for over twenty years and have a very good understanding of my investments. Now, with your proposed rule, you are taking away my freedom to select how I invest in a well respected investment selection. If you want to control, which you seem to want to do, go after crypto, because it is going to cost investors big time
I am absolutely oppose limitations on my ability to invest in ANY equities whether they be leverage/inverse, crypto, volatility-linked funds or any other instrument that I am able to freely invest in today.
If you want investors to limit their risks in any investment, ensure that brokers have educational materials on their websites when someone attempts to buy into what might be considered higher
