Displaying 3511 - 3520 of 9026 Results
As a United States citizen with sound mind to make my own decisions on public investments that are right for me, I oppose the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority putting restrictions on what public investments I should be able to invest in. Public investments should be available to all of us and not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special restrictions or approvals to
As a single senior woman investor, I want my voice to be heard. This is my life savings we are talking about, as slim as they may be compared to wealthy investors. 1. Leveraged and inverse funds are mandatory to me especially in this declining market, as they act like a hedge to protect my investments. 2. I have a financial advisor because I am not astute in financial matters. Although I
FINRA assesses and collects regulatory fees that fund FINRA’s regulatory activities, including the Gross Income Assessment (GIA), Personnel Assessment and Branch Assessment Fees, as well as user fees for the services FINRA provides.
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are
Because I have a high degree of understanding of the inverse and leveraged funds, I understand why regulation is being considered. However, traders have always been and always should be responsible for their own investing knowledge and actual trades.
I am AGAINST:
Having to demonstrate a high net worth. There are plenty of traders out there with a high degree of trading acumen but low net worth
I as an investor not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged like Hunter and Joe Biden.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, especially like leveraged and inverse funds. I
I as an investor, not regulators should be able to choose public investment which are right for myself & family.
We should not have to go thru any special process or passing a test to use these tools. I am extremely capable in understanding the risks of these inverse and leveraged funds.
These leverage and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. I use them to protect
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST.
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies in many ways, including helping me protect (hedge) my investments, or seek enhanced
Please do not restrict my right or ability to invest. I select the funds I wish to invest in based on my own research, knowledge and risk tolerance. I enter the stock market with full knowledge that it involves risk and no investment is guaranteed to be profitable. With that knowledge, I proceed with the investments I believe are a best fit for the long term success of my family. Please do not
Good morning,
I am writing to discuss the impact that limiting leveraged funds would have on me as a private investor. I, as a private investor, feel confidently that I have the knowledge and experience to make personal decisions of how I invest my own money. I do not feel that it is in the purview of regulators to make determinations as to where and how I am able to use money for long-term and