Displaying 3461 - 3470 of 9026 Results
I strongly oppose the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), that we may not be able to buy leveraged and inverse funds and dozens of other popular investments deemed to be complex unless we: Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge Demonstrate a high net worth Get special approval from your broker Attest to reading
Hello, you need to fix your system asap. Naked shorting is way too easy and the fines are just ridiculously low. Remember: A fine that doesn't even cover the amount they gained and doesn't result into jail time is just a high bar entry check, nothing more... Dark pools are the shadiest crap I've ever seen in my whole life. What is fair about SOME folks being allowed to hide their
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementAdvertisingLegal & ComplianceMutual Fund
Executive Summary
Beginning May 1, 1994, the NASD will assess increased charges for the review of certain advertisements and sales literature, including printed material, video and audio media, printed and audio material in excess of a certain amount, and material submitted for expedited review. The text of the
Dear SEC, Rule #S7-24-15: I personally should be able to choose the public investments which I deem appropriate for me and my family. NOT you! Just because some may be privileged doesn't mean only they should have access. I do not need to pass some special test or have money as the privileged do to have access to a public investment. Leverage and inverse funds play an important part of a
I feel strongly that I should not have to prove to anyone that I am capable of choosing my own investments. Such a restriction would prevent me from using inverse ETFs to hedge during downtrends in the market (such as we are currently experiencing) and also prevent me from taking advantage of downtrends in the market. Cooling off periods may expose me to a complete inability to protect my money
I am a public investor, I opposed restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds because: - Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged, I am not a regulator, I am one of the public, so I should have the right being able to choose any public investments; - I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I should not have to go
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
The SEC needs to stop placing burdensome regulations on the average trader while kowtowing to the rich. Stop over regulating everything! I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have been investing since the third grade and have been a licensed broker and am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Regardless of my background this is move is over reach and I shouldn