Free trade is free trade. I use inverse leveraged funds to help hedge my portfolio. In these volatile markets these are necessary tools to mitigate your personal risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leverage and inverse funds. I completely understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks. Public
Comments: Over the years there has been enough said about the features and risks of the leveraged instruments like 3x ETFs. Brokerages also issue pop-up warnings on the risks and margin requirements as we enter a trade. I am strongly in favor of *not* changing the current rules for these leveraged instruments. Doing so would reduce the investment/trading options for hundreds of thousands retail
I have never met anyone who thinks investing has no risk. People are by nature very protective of their assets, so give them credit for knowing how to manage risk. My broker already makes me read a disclaimer regarding risky or complex securities every time i seek to trade one. Placing restrictions "protecting" retail investors and traders from themselves inhibits them from the same
How dare you try to limit what I can and can not buy. It is absolutely none of your business what I do with my money as long as my actions fit within the confines of the law. Risk is an inherent factor of market involvement and it is each investor's duty to mitigate that risk for themselves, not yours. Imposing arbitrary limitations limits both the agency of the investor and their goals
Hello
I am an investor with over 25 years of investment experience. I should be able to buy/ trade any public investment that is available in the market place that fits my objectives. Institutions already have a lot of advanced capabilities thats not available to individuals like me. Leveraged and inverse ETFs are an effective way of hedging and reduce capital risk. I know the risk and benefits
I have been investing for a long time and understand my own risks. Investing in publicly traded funds should not be limited to the wealthy. As part of an overall portfolio I use leveraged fund to hedge investments and increase returns. I am not borrowing funds to do this and understand they may be extremely volatile at times. I can choose the portion of my portfolio I want to expose to this risk
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest by not being allowed to buy leveraged and inverse funds at risk. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. There should be no special process I have to go through to invest in public securities when I am capable of
I oppose any restrictions or limits to the use of leveraged and inverse funds. I use them as a small portion of my portfolios to regulate my risk exposure during difficult markets and make efficient use of my investment capital to enhance returns during good markets. I fully understand how leveraged and inverse funds work and their associated risks. I don't want regulations put in place to
I, not regulators or anyone else should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. It's my money and I and only I should decide what I can pursue with it. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the already rich or privileged. With every trade there is an inherent risk and this should be decided by me, not someone or some
I believe in a free market. What this democratic country is about. I understand the risks associated with leverage investments, I believe e it is unfair and wrong to limit our freedom to invest, especially with inverse etfs. It is up to me to decide the risk I am willing to take. To impede me from investing in inverse etfs in the start of a bear market is not fair. It goes against the principles