Why is it that regulators want to take so much time taking away the ability for the average person to actually use a product that can let them risk and succeed toward more financial freedom and security. Products such as leveraged ETF's and Futures are complex but the individuals that invest know the risks and should have the same RIGHT to invest as any other fat cat on wall street that
TO: All NASD Members and Other Interested Persons
LAST DATE FOR COMMENT: MARCH 1, 1988.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The NASD requests comments on proposed amendments to Article HI, Section 27 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice that would (1) prescribe specific supervisory practices and procedures for all member firms and (2) revise the definitions of "office of supervisory jurisdiction" (OSJ)
Summary
FINRA is soliciting comment on a proposal to establish a new trade reporting requirement for transactions in over-the-counter options on securities with terms that are identical or substantially similar to listed options. FINRA is proposing to require firms to report this information to FINRA on a daily basis (end-of-day) for regulatory purposes only.
Questions regarding this Notice
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementLegal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
Discussion
In Notice to Members 94-09, published in February 1994, the NASD announced Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval of a new Section 46 of Article HI of the Rules of Fair Practice requiring members holding open orders to adjust the price and size of such orders by the amount of any
FINRA firms must have and enforce policies and procedures governing the withdrawal or transmittal of funds or other
assets from customer accounts.
There is no need for any further regulation of leveraged or inverse ETF's. The risks of these products are widely known and understood by the vast majority of investor. It should be noted that they are no more risky than some of the "penny stocks" or "junk bonds" that currently trade. Despite using leverage, they are often less leveraged than many publicly traded
Dear SEC, Rule #S7-24-15: I personally should be able to choose the public investments which I deem appropriate for me and my family. NOT you! Just because some may be privileged doesn't mean only they should have access. I do not need to pass some special test or have money as the privileged do to have access to a public investment. Leverage and inverse funds play an important part of a
As an investor I want and deserve the freedom to make my own choices about assets in which I invest. The SEC should not be taking on the role of "big brother" to oversee and perhaps overrule the decisions of millions of investors. Many of the decisions that all Americans make carry risks even greater than our investments. For example, the person we choose to marry or our career choices
It is ridiculous that FINRA puts in place rules which supposedly "protect" citizens, when in fact these regulations prevent ordinary people from making money on the stock market. Meanwhile, because regular people are excluded, Wall Street fat cats get to run rampant, making huge profits and taking money out of the middle class economy. As far as I can tell, FINRA protects Wall Street
SummaryIn February 2012, pursuant to an SEC order, FINRA established an accounting support fee (GASB Accounting Support Fee) to adequately fund the annual budget of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The GASB Accounting Support Fee is collected on a quarterly basis from member firms that report trades to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). Each member firm’s
