Dear FINRA,
I appreciate some of the thoughts in the SEC proposed rule #S7-24-15, however I do oppose restrictions placed on my investment rights. I'm fully aware that all investments come with risk, and it is my responsibility to read a prospectus and research my investments options and choices. As a hardworking member of society, I should have the right to use the money I earn whether
Anyone capable of understanding what a stock or bond is, is more than capable of understanding 3x daily leverage on a product.
Leveraged ETFs are a valuable tool for responsible investors and are integral to mine and many others' financial planning.
More importantly, the fund websites already have lengthy disclosures regarding the risks of levered instruments. If someone is going to
To whom it may concern,
DO NOT LIMIT MY RIGHT to invest in leveraged and inverse funds!! DO NOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, COMPLICATIONS, PRIOR COURSES, FEES, MINIMUMS, ETC. before I can invest the way I see best for my families future. I regularly use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge the risk within my portfolio. I also used leveraged and inverse funds as well as inverse leveraged funds
Stop regulation of leveraged funds We dont need more regulations about what funds I can and cannot invest in. These are public investments and they should be available to anyone who chooses to use them. These leveraged and inverse funds are critical to my portfolio strategy. I use them in small amounts to help hedge my investments. It is my hard earned money, I reserve the right to invest it
I regularly use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge my investments. They are an invaluable tool and I use them in a sensible and limited capacity. I am not a "high net worth" individual. I find it offensive that FINRA would even consider taking these away from regular investors. This would just be further proof that this game is "rigged" for the big players.
Comments: I believe that it is an overstep by FINRA to limit access to leveraged and inverse ETFs. By limiting access, FINRA is unduly infringing on the rights of free market participants. Providing education on these products to investors is more than appropriate, but limiting access would be an overstep. I, and all of the people I know personally, have a deep understanding of the
Hi. I understand your concerns. But I believe that using criteria such as tests or high net worth to determine who is eligible to trade securities that are deemed "complex", such as leveraged ETFs, is unnecessary and can actually do more harm than good to my long-term financial security.
I can assure you that I am an active trader and that I know what I'm doing. I am
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
This is
I ,not regulators , should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
Dear Sirs,
In my opinion FINRA is taking a deceitful step in proposing to restrict an individual's right to invest in Public investments. What you propose is an over reaching "Nanny" solution. People who invest do so with the knowledge there are risks. We win some and we lose some. The dwindling middle class has been affected more from Federal manipulation of the