Large hedge funds, investment banks, the very wealthy have the means to create their own leveraged and inverse investments. By eliminating leveraged and inverse ETF's for the public, regulators would merely be creating another avenue by which the wealthy remain and grow more wealthy and the common investor is barred from that same wealth creating opportunity. Is that the underlying
As an experienced investor who has been making my own financial decisions for 20 years, I find it to be an overreach by FINRA to restrict the ability for me to make my own decisions, thus forcing me to utilize unnecessary investment advisor firms. There are countless resources available to the general public, as well as investment documentation available to investors to understand the risks
Dear Sirs/Madams, It's come to my attention that you are considering regulating so-called complex or leveraged ETFs. As an active small investor, I implore you not to do so. I use these ETFs to hedge risk in the marketplace, and this gives me confidence in my investments, knowing that I can sustain market shocks, as well as to maintain reasonable rates of return. I have been using these for
Investing on any asset class should be a personal decision. Those investors that do our due diligence to educate ourselves before investing and that may not be considered 'high net worth' should be able to have the same opportunities than 'high net worth' companies and individuals. I understand the risks and time decay of leverage investments and do not need to
Dear Sir:
I am writing you to oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
I should be able to choose the public available investments that right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I an
To Whom It May Concern:
I am opposed to the proposed FINRA action (Notice #22-08) limiting my ability to utilize leveraged and inverse in my overall portfolio investments.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their
I want to voice my opinion that I STRONGLY oppose FINRA regulation Notice #22-08 that will attempt to limit my ability to invest in leveraged and/or inverse funds. I should have the freedom to make my own investment decisions and I do not want regulators to make those decisions for me. I regularly use both leveraged and inverse funds to limit risk and to enhance my returns. They are a limited
We should have a free choice to invest inside a regulated universe. A basket of leveraged fund is not different than a stock with high beta as both could react to volatile market conditions. Oftentimes, it is better due to some diversification benefits which is not available on a stock , which are spurred by speculative positions. Inverse leverage funds offer cheaper alternative than options to
Hi, I like to have freedom to invest in leveraged and inverse funds without going through tests and additional constraints. I usually do my research on what I'm investing and so knowledgeable enough to make my own independent decisions considering all risks involved. I usually use these funds to hedge my investments or get some higher returns based on their leverage. I want investment
I strongly oppose this measure. People must have the right to freely trade investment products at their own risk and based on their own research. If an individual decides to blindly accept a financial institution/advisor's trading recommendations then that individual could lose significant amounts of money regardless of whether or not leveraged or inverse exchange-traded products are