Displaying 551 - 560 of 1654 Results
I am absolutely opposed. This type of classism will further promote the growing disparity within our nation. It is the antithesis of equality and cements the fast growing perception that America is a land without opportunity. There should not be a list of requirements to complete before having the ability to access investments in private securities.
The course of action proposed is starkly
As a self advised , private investor I should not have any restrictions placed upon what I can choose t invest in for myself and my family. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I fully understand cryptocurrency funds such as BITO and their risks. These investments
Dear Sirs,
As owner of leveraged and inverse funds I am opposed to any legislation or regulation of these funds owned by private investors. I believe I should be the one to be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. These investment should be available to the public without any restrictions such as passing an imposed test of my specialized investment knowledge
I have used leveraged funds as powerful tools to hedge my portfolio and take advantage of certain periods in the market. In fact, I saved for my house down payment using a leveraged ETF and Im pretty sure its the only way I would have afforded a down payment as a first time homebuyer.
I think its already ridiculous small investors like myself cant invest in private companies just because were
I should be able to choose what is right for me as an adult. FINRA can give guidance but shouldn't block instruments arbitarily. Even private equity investors go horribly wrong so having large portfolio is no gaurantee for sane investment. People like me from middle class rely on long term compunding of leveraged instruments for a sizeable retirement fund. for example there are a whole
Sophisticated investor rules are outdated in the age of the internet. I have multiple degrees related to investment and financial analysis. Under the Sophisticated investor rules I cant invest in certain opportunities, and now you want to expand that? Excluding the average American from any investment opportunity does nothing but ensure that those who are already wealthy will continue to gain
I resent the thought that I cannot choose for myself what investment products work best for me. And I find it insulting, manipulative and corrupt that only those with privilege (high net worth investors) would be allowed to use these trading vehicles. I use these types of vehicles to hedge positions as well as to take advantage of down movements, since I can not use options in my IRA account. I
Who does the government think they are to determine what public investments I as an individual Im allowed to make? All investments have been vetted by regulatory commissions and are valid, legal, investment instruments that have been made available for decades. The idea that you would impose conditions upon which a private individual can make an investment is essentially communism and entirely
Go ahead and regulate whether I'm smart enough to invest my own money. Take away the inverse ETF's and leveraged funds, but please let me have access to insider trading like the rest of you crooked politicians. Or maybe just send the rest of us every day Americans to prison like you did to Martha Stewart. OR you can let legislation pass that allows us to take our social security
To Whom it may concern,
I have concerns about proposed rule #22-08. I am private individual who has been buying and selling stocks, futures, and options for several years, and who greatly appreciates my ability to add to and hedge my portfolio in any way that the market offers. For example, buying a small amount of an inverse ETF is a quick and easy way to hedge an overly long portfolio during a