To apply these additional burdens to investors is absurd.
Why only allow the wealthy elites of society access to leveraged products?
Is FINRA my nanny? Can I not decide what risk is appropriate for my own family? Does one need to be so highly enlightened to understand levered products?
Will you start saying that Growth stocks are too risky and limit my ability to invest in them too? If not, why
I oppose regulations that limit my right to invest in public securities and public investments, including inverse funds and leveraged products. People should not have to pass regulator-imposed tests or have high net worth in order to be allowed to make investments and balance their portfolios with the products that best represent their investment goals and risk appetite.
If there are investment
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments, I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I invest in public securities such leveraged and inverse funds. I understand their risk involved. public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I do not need these measures imposed on me, leveraged and inverse funds are
I feel it is discriminatory to have to go through a special process like passing a test before I can invest in leveraged and inverse funds. In finding these funds and evaluating them to invest my money I have inherently proven that I understand these funds and their risks.
The measures proposed would limit my ability to grow my retirement funding and provide for the long term security of my
Hello,
I am adamantly opposed to any additional regulation on leveraged or inverse funds as they are important to our family's investment strategies and allow me to manage and reduce risk through their very structure.
Though not a major part of my holdings, the leverage and inverse nature allow me to protect the remainder of my holdings when the market situation dictates while not
I oppose the proposed restrictions on inverse and leveraged funds.
They are a part of the investment toolkit used in my portfolio.
These products are sufficiently documented in their prospectus.
As an individual investor I assume the risk of making my own decisions and am capable of making my own decisions.
Limiting these products to only high-net worth investors is inherently unfair and promotes
ATT Finra
I not you the regulators should be able to choose public investments that are right for me. Public investments are just that - PUBLIC INVESTMENTS!!!! THEY SHOULDN'T BE JUST FOR THE PRIVILEGED!
I shouldn't have to go throught andy special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I don't need or want these measures imposed on me.
Message to regulators; As an investor, I am totally opposed to restricting my rights to invest or make public investments. Also, as an investor, no one decides more than me which public investmens are suitable for my financial goals. Public investmens must also available to the public and not only to the privileged. In addition, as an investor, I do not have to go through a special process, such
I oppose further regulations to public investing. It is my humble opinion that instead of trying to implement radical and unprecedented regulations to restrict public trading that you focus your time and energy on educating the general public. I believe the regulations proposed by Rule #22-08 will help continue the current trend of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. I have been
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST. I've been using leveraged and close-ended funds for over a decade now, to successfully manage and reduce risk while enhancing returns and stability of passive income in my overall portfolio. I see these tools as an important part of my overall investment strategy and they signifiantly simplify the otherwise complex and expensive alternative of