it would be a huge mistake to eliminate or limit purchase of leveraged or inverse funds. I use them to limit the downside of my bond and stock holdings. Without it , no question, volatility would increase & an important tool taken away from the public. Complex investments can use more education & disclosure from ISSUERS; but certainly not the proposed investment knowledge
Regarding Regulatory Notice #22-08:
I am very much AGAINST the proposal to remove or restrict my access to tools that I use to maintain and enhance my financial security such as leveraged and inverse ETFs.
The fund families and brokerage houses themselves do a very good job of explaining the risks of these products. I have relied on these tools for years in conjunction with volatility-based
To whom it may concern - I am violently opposed to any rule restricting access to investment products for the public. This is just another mechanism to make the rich richer, and steal money from the masses who are trying to build wealth through sophisticated avenues. Your hubris in attempting to control the public's investment options by claiming that it is "in our best interest"
I should be allowed to invest freely into projects that I see financially beneficial and not be locked out of the real gains because of some ridiculous rule that states I'm not eligible because I don't have enough money. That reasoning was forced into law to keep people from bettering their selves and goes against everything America was supposedly founded on. I will echo this
Effective May 28, 2024, in accordance with the industry-led shortened settlement cycle from two business days (T+2) to one business day (T+1), FINRA will implement its changes for equity trade reporting. Please see DTCC notice for details of the financial industry coordination for this project and FINRA’s initial Technical Notice for this initiative which includes updates to its specifications.
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws to establish an administration and delivery fee for the new Municipal Advisor Principal Examination (“Series 54 examination”).
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend FINRA Rule 7620A (FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility Reporting Fees) to modify the query fee applicable to non-retail participants that use the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility Carteret (the “FINRA/Nasdaq TRF Carteret”) and the FINRA/
I am very concerned about recent intentions to limit the publics ability to invest in leveraged and/or inverse funds. No one knows better what investments are right for me than me. I should not be required to prove myself to anyone before being allowed to invest my hard earned money where I see fit. The whole idea of the nanny state where the government needs to take care of me is extremely
Individual investors have been excluded from the advantages of large trading firms and lawmakers. Taking away individual investor RIGHTS to invest in leveraged & Inverse funds is just another ball & chain on individuals in their strides towards financial independence from Government. If an individual had invested in a triple leveraged S&P index fund for the last 10 years,
Ladies and Gentlemen: By limiting access to any investment opportunities you block any of us who are trying to improve our lives from investing you lock us from being able to improve. There is already in place on some things restrictions defined as an accredited investor. If you block us from being able to invest you doom us to classes of rich and poor and the middle class merging in with the
