Please oppose any restrictions on my right to use my money as I deem fit. I understand the risk of leveraged funds and do not require any special measures imposed on me. I can't help but believe you really don't care about my welfare but only care about corporations possibly losing capital. Why would things change now when things did not change during the longest bull run in the history
Dear Sirs, for several years I have been investing in the market and I am well aware of the risks and rewards of the available assets and tools to negotiate them. I am a retired small trader with accounts at three different brokers, therefore I wrote three of these comments, one for each platform. I am an educated person and feel comfortable and aware of my investment proficiency, Please, do not
I am opposed to regulations limiting investors ability to trade and invest in leveraged and inverse funds. Most brokerage firms already have safe guards in place to protect uneducated and unsophisticated investors, such as income and investment limits, and warning labels. Seriously - you have just as much risk in investing in Bitcoin - or AMC !! Or trading on margin !! These leveraged funds
Dear Sir/Madam:
Leveraged and inverse funds are a vital part of helping me to hedge my portfolio and avoiding constant trading. I use these tools to short the S&P 500 or other indexes when they have become frothy (in my view). These products reduce the volatility and allow me to stay in core positions longer. I use them as short-term hedges and the risks of staying in them too long
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable and am sure many others are as well, of understanding
I oppose FINRA's proposed rule #22-08. My ability to invest the finances of my family should not be left up to the discretion of government or regulators. The ability to invest in public securities should not be withheld from the general public not should we be required to pass a test to invest our own finances. We take a known, and sometimes unknown, risk when we invest our finances
I would suggest that if you are considering stiffer regulations on leveraged investments, you should take a look in other places where there is nothing but hot air underneath. Netflix, Rivian and hundreds more highly inflated stocks. The problem with that is given your belief that more government is better government would drive you there without that suggestion. These investments give the little
I am writing in response to the proposal to regulate the use of inverse ETFs and leveraged funds. I strongly oppose the federal government regulating which public investments I can and cannot invest in for myself and my family, as well as any additional regulatory processes required to make an investment of my choosing. There are already plenty of disclosures that address the potential risks and
I oppose the purchase restrictions. Trading of these types of leveraged funds should be available to all. As an alternative to the restrictions, a requirement could be to allow purchasing after receiving one training course on the risks of these funds. Under no circumstances should trading of these types of funds be limited to only those with a high net worth. An alternative could be a limit on
As an individual investor, I take full responsibility for my investment choices. Public investment tools should be available to all, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds, options, etc. are important financial tools in the portfolio. I sometimes use them for risk management. I am strongly against the proposal to limit the trading of such financial tools. I do not want to have to go