I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST.
I have used both leveraged and inverse funds in the past. They have been especially useful as a hedge against adverse market conditions as well as an enhancement to favorable conditions. I am aware of both their risks and rewards. I view Inverse funds as a type of 'health insurance' for the portfolio in uncertain times; you hope you
When it comes to the death of a brokerage account holder, many firms have trained staff and resources to help the living manage estate matters. Once a firm has been notified of the death of an account holder, here are some things you can expect.
Is this not a free country? I should be able to choose what investments are suitable for my portfolio. Why should this investment only be reserved for a chosen few? I shouldn't have to prove myself to regulators that I am perfectly capable of making investment decisions that are in my best interest. While I've utilized these products for years, they are not my complete strategy, but a
I think it is important for investors to know what they are getting into. But more importantly, you have to let people learn from their mistakes and their successes without micro-managing every possible risk. There are all ready far too many regulatory hurdles and hoops that choke the ability to do almost anything and people still make dumb choices. Please do not restrict the ability of everyday
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. Public investments should be available to everybody, not just the 1% and other elites. I am an adult and am capable of understanding the risks involved with investments, and should be free to place my money in investments if I so choose - there should be no special hoops or processes like passing a financial literacy test
FINRA Requests Comments on Proposed Consolidated FINRA Rules Governing Securities Loans and Borrowings, Permissible Use of Customers' Securities and Callable Securities
Attn: FINRA I do NOT want to be restricted as to when and how I invest my monies for my personal financial satisfaction. I've had to invest outside of a major brokerage; now choosing ProShares funds for this reason. I'm a senior citizen with many years of managing my own investments and am well aware of the risks life and ALL investments present and do NOT need to be further advised. Do
I should be able to choose the public investments that I determine right for me. While I appreciate the regulators intention, they should not infringe on the retail investors RIGHT to trade all publicly traded funds when the risks are well known. Inverse funds are an important investment strategy for me, especially in times of a bear market. Sorry, not my fault it isn't working out for the
I do not support SEC Proposed Rule S7-24-15. I should have the right to determine what public investments are right for me without going thru a special process like passing a test. I am capable understanding the risks involved with these securities. Leverage and inverse funds are an important to my investment strategies. I use them to hedge and seek higher returns as a limited portion of my
There are many ways to design a portfolio as one tries to balance growth and risk. One method is to create a low volatility portfolio and use leverage to achieve the desired growth rate. There are many ways to achieve leverage in a portfolio such as margin, options, and futures. Leveraged ETF's provide another mechanism to leverage a portfolio that is much simpler and potentially cheaper