You have no right to restrictions. I will pull all my money and others might do so. Then, where are you going to apply your restrictions? I have right to choose and do what is the best for me and not just to only the privileged. You REGULATORS sound as lobbyist. I am capable to understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks and do not like to be impose. I have been in investment long
I am very disappointed with the proposal to restrict my ability to buy leveraged and inversed fund. I am perfectly capable of educating myself about those instruments and I don't need to pass any special test. I am using these instruments to reduce risk and they are very beneficial to my portfolio strategy. I hope you would not enact any restrictions on purchasing those instruments by
Public Investments should be between the investor and the financial firm associated. The risks associated with investing are well known and explained by financial firms. Personal investments and retirement plans are controlled by the investor and investment retirement planners and critical to the investment success and well being of all. Based on Historical experience, especially lately,
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and not
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and
I fully oppose restricting freedom to invest and creating obstacles for retail investors to interact with "complex products". If the intention is to protect people's finance, instead of taking the lazy path of restriction, a better way would be to educate. Majority of retail investors understand the risk they are taking by entering the markets, and creating a silo for the "
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am more than capable of understanding my investments and their risks and I do not
Not regulators-I should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me and mine family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I do not have to go thru any special process like passing an exam before I can buy public securities. I am capable of understanding mine investments and their risks. I do not need terrible mesures, imposed on
Please leave leveraged and inverse ETFs in tact. They allow simple investors like myself buy and sell simple ETFs like stock without having to do complex short trades or PUTS&CALLS which require more sophisticated trading knowledge. The ETFs work very well and simply for average investor. We realize the risk and losses are contained by broker if necessary. Thank you.