Why are regulatory busybodies thinking that I am 3 years old and need to be "protected" from myself?
I'm a grown man and can make my own decisions. I strongly resent any attempt to deprive me of this right.
My trading plan uses leveraged ETFs as a part of reducing the volatility and risk of my entire portfolio.
I insist that no changes be made to rules/regulations
I use inverse funds to hedge gains in other investments. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and know the risks involved. My portfolio is up 8% already this year, whereas the S&P is down ~14% since the beginning of 2022.
I oppose any restrictions or limitations on my right to invest in publicly available investments. I don't need to pass any test to be able to invest
I am writing due to possible restrictions on buying inverse funds. I feel it is everyone's right to invest in any public funds and they should not be limited to a few. Any investing has a certain amount of risk and there should not be certain funds that require additional training or a set amount of personal assets. I use inverse funds as part of my portfolio to hedge against the
these regulations are extremely excessive. Investors in such products do not need you to assume that just because we invest via leveraged ETFs that we dont know what we are doing or understand the risks. In my opinion leveraged ETFs are one of the most effective ways to invest. I believe this so strongly i am teaching my children how to incorporate them into their portfolios as they are starting
My husband and I invest casually in video games, automotive, and TQQQ. I feel everyone should have access to public investments. To invest in any stock or fund involves some risk. That is the nature of it. My family should have the same access to investments that we have always had. If we were restricted from trading TQQQ, wouldnt that take the free out of free market?
Dear Finra,
I strongly encourage you to continue allowing retail and retirement investors like myself to continue investing in levered and complex products. These products are great investment tools for people like myself who choose to perform careful and thoughtful research while understanding the risks that come with them. It would be government overreach to restrict individuals from making
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. For many years, I have been studying about complex investments in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds, and feel confident of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I have been successfully using them to seek enhanced returns and building wealth. I don't need regulators to put restrictions on my right to
Dear Sir/Madam:
I am adamantly opposed to the restrictions proposed with regard to leveraged and inverse funds. I have owned one for years, and am totally aware of the risks involved. It has also been one of my best investments.
I am extremely concerned that these measures will hamper liquidity of the investment I already have, as well as restrict the ability of buying similar products in the
I am writing to express my opposition to increase regulation limiting the use and trading of reverse and leveraged securities. While these can represent a higher risk form of investing, they can also be an effective way for ordinary and yet well informed investors to navigate different trends and market environments. Efforts to limi this type of investing to the privileged few does not benefit
I am opposed to restrictions on my ability to trade in publicly traded hedge or derivative funds.
I am of age and use these types of investments as a very small part of our family investments, but they allow me to participate in the market during economic periods of change without liquidating my long-term holdings.
A simple and straightforward note or warning would be sufficient to alert