I don't need regulators, or anyone else to make my decision on pubic investments or any other investments. I know what best for myself and the ability to pubic investments and others should be made available to the whole public not to just the elites. I of having any restrictions or any special processes to invest in public securities or any other investments. I'm capable of
We, the general public, should be able to choose our own investment opportunities that are right for us and our families. Public investments should be made available to all of us, not just the privileged. Also we shouldn't have to go through any special processes or tests to prove we're capable of investing and the risks these investments hold. Thank you for your time and
I believe it is the investor's right to participate in any open and public investment. It is up to the investor to decide what is appropriate risk for oneself. Public investments should be open to all of the public, not just the privileged! Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies! I use them as a hedge for my portfolio and to enhance it! Limiting the use
I oppose restrictions on investing in public investments. My broker warns me that some are not suitable for long-term investments, and I heed my broker's advice. I have years of experience trading stocks and options and know the risks of what I am investing in. We have enough regulations especially in the stock and options areas. So, respectfully, let us act like the adults we are.
I do not think the government should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
I should not have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leverage and inverse funds help me to protect my investments and I use these as a small portion of my
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. The regulators do not need these measures imposed on me.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I use leverage and inverse funds to
I've used leveraged funds successfully for many years. They have significantly improved my investment returns while maintaining better capital preservation for investment flexibility. After acquiring years of experience via trading leveraged ETF's I don't want to take on added regulations not do I want to risk losing my right to leveraged trading nor have it limited.
I should be able to choose my own public investments.
No special process or test shold be required. I understand leveraged and inverse funds completely and their risks. I don't need regulators to impose measures on me.
Thes funds are important to my investment strategy. They help me to protect my investments and/or seek enhanced returns. I use them as a limited part of my portfiolio.
I do not think that regulators should be involved in my investment choices. I am perfectly capable of understanding the risks and benefits of investing in leveraged, inverse, and any other fund/stock available to the public. The leveraged funds I have invested in periodically have allow me to hedge against market transitions. They are an important part of my investment strategy and I believe they
To whom it may concern,
I am extremely bothered by this proposal. As I am heavily invested in 401k I would like to be able to accumulate inverse funds in my Roth account to mitigate any risk of a market downturn. It is especially cynical if these inverse funds are available only to hedge funds. Please consider the voices of the retail investors as well.
Thank you very much for your consideration