To whom it may concern:
I do not think additional regulations on leveraged or inverse investments are necessary. We are capable of understanding the risks ourselves and do not need help in this area.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to our investment strategies by optimizing gains and protecting against loss as part of our portfolio. These tools should be available to all, not just the
To whom it may concern,
I, as an individual investor, should be able to choose the investment vehicles that I deem appropriate for my needs. I am not a child that needs to be coddled. I am perfectly capable of understanding and accepting the risks that I am undertaking when using leveraged and inverse funds. Excess regulations or processes that inhibit my ability to invest as I see fit cause an
Access to complex public investment products are critical to the advancement of wealth for people of limited means. Yes, their complexity increases risk, but the potential return allows poor people with some riskable savings to at least aspire to have some wealth down the line. To limit people with only a few thousand to 10% per year furthers wealth disparity and is bad for the little guy.
It's especially important regulators hear from you in your own words. Please use the body of this email to customize your response.
These categories of investment vehicles are important for my portfolio diversity and protection. They are an important tool for helping me assess potential risk sentiment in the market and have a tendency to provide higher returns. Please do not restrict
Yes I ask that FINRA puts limit on how much money can be invested in L&I funds, it should be no more that 20% of portfolio, brokerage should limit purchase in this funds as these are extremely high risk funds that most investors do not understand. Sending a disclosure does not help as most people do not read it or undersand the language, it should be restricted by brokerage.
Comments: We individual but educated investors should still have access to leverage and inverse funds and products because (we) educated investors do understand the risks . I do agree with signing the yearly agreement to trade these products but our access should NOT be taken away. Some of us do NOT want to work until we are 90 years old.
I oppose government mandated restrictions on types of investments. I feel it is my right to choose what type of products to invest in, including leveraged and inverse funds. These funds are extremely important to my long term investment strategy, especially as it allows me to keep emergency cash funds more easily accessible. I understand my risks when investing in any product, and should be able
I oppose the regulation that requires extra testing before I can invest my own money. It is my money. I understand fully when I signed up to be my own trader. I take full responsibility. I do not appreciate the extra steps you are forcing me to do before I can invest in my future. Are there risks? Of course! However, that is for me to decide.
To whom it may concern I respectfully disagree with any legislation that restricts either the access or the outright ability for me to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I do my research and I understand the risks. I understand how to invest in these as part of a larger strategy. Please do not remove the rights of people like myself who independently do the work and choose to invest in these
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. It is very important that I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding investments and their risks. As such, I should be allowed to invest in any securities as it is my right to free choice as a citizen of this