I support FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08. Complex investment scheme should be limited as they're deemed to be highly risky for lay person. Greedy broker and fund investors take high commissions and fees while tricking people those funds are in high yield.
For people would like to invest, they NEED:
Pass a regulator-imposed test of your specialized investment knowledge
Demonstrate a
I, myself not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am plenty capable of understanding
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I assist my retired mom via dividend income investing to supplement her SS benefits, and your contemplated imposition of restrictions to invest would, in practice, forbid me from investing on her behalf because she would not be able to pass those tests on her own.
This year, I used leveraged and inverse funds for my mother's account and met her financial objective. If these tools are
I oppose any new regulations on leverged or inverse investment instruments. I have been investing in leveraged funds for 8+ years and fully understand their place in my portfolio. These should be open to any investor and not just privileged. There should be no special process or test required or review of my qualifications to allow their use. I am fully capable of understanding the risks and do
Proposed Rule Change to Amend the Customer And Industry Codes to Expedite List Selection in Arbitration
I use leveraged etfs as a part of an investment portfolio. These products are now a fundamental part of what I do in business and for personal investments. They provide a convenient means of achieving what would otherwise require the use of options or futures. Indeed, I have compared the performance of leveraged etfs and futures and found the etfs perform similarly enough that I continue to use
I believe should be be able to choose my own public investments that are right for me and shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities such as, leveraged and inverse funds. I do not want regulators to have these measures imposed on me since I am capable of understanding the risks of these funds. Leveraged and inverse funds help
Dear Sirs and Madams: I feel that I have the right to invest in any investment that fits my financial requirements without having to 'pass a test'. These proposed regulations treat US citizens as children! I do not need 'help' from Federal Regulators to manage my money. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important and critical part of my investment strategy. When markets are
I am an adult. I, not regulators, can decide what investments are right for me. No tests or proof of a "high net worth" are necessary to determine the appropriateness of where and how I invest my money. Why should only the wealthy have the freedom to invest their funds as desired? My success in investing in leveraged and inverse funds is important to my overall financial strategy, and
