I recent got the citizenship. In the civic test I learn that the freedom is one of the core value of American. I should have the freedom of choose what public investments I want and take the risk I am willing to take. This should include the inverse funds. The inverse funds is a very important in my portfolio. I have long term investment which are regular funds. But at a high position, instead of
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investment suitable for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing. This is no different from a poll literacy tax. We are intelligent enough to know and understand the risk of any investment.
Summary
The purpose of this Election Notice is to notify members of an upcoming election to fill one large firm and one mid-size firm seat on the National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), and to announce the FINRA Nominating & Governance Committee (Nominating Committee) nominees for these vacancies. Eligible individuals not nominated by the Nominating Committee who obtain the requisite number
JOINT REQUEST FOR COMMENT
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Legal & Compliance
Operations
Registered Representatives
Senior Management
Training
Correspondence—General
Electronic CommunicationsRule 2210 (Communications with the Public)Rule 2211 (Institutional Sales Material and Correspondence)Rule 3010 (Supervision) Supervision
Supervision of Electronic
Do NOT change investment options. Current warnings each time a leveraged trade is made by service providers is enough.
I oppose FINRA's proposed rule #22-08. My ability to invest the finances of my family should not be left up to the discretion of government or regulators. The ability to invest in public securities should not be withheld from the general public not should we be required to pass a test to invest our own finances. We take a known, and sometimes unknown, risk when we invest our finances
The proposed rule that would restrict MY investments choices is incompatible with a free society. I am an adult and make my own decisions in regards to all aspects of my life, including my investments. FINRA has no role in restricting those decisions. I fully understand what a leveraged fund is, and what an inverse fund is, but that is not the main point. The main point is I should not, after 20
You are not regulators. I should be able to chose my own style of investment. It should be available to all of the public. I should not have to go through any examination or testing before I can invest into public securities. I understand leverage and invest funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important for my investment strategy. These securities help me to protect
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to everyone, not just the privileged. I understand how these products work and do not need oversight from anyone or having to pass a test to invest. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my overall strategy so I have downside protection if the market tanks. Spend your time
I believe that I - and not regulators with potential agendas should have the right to choose the public investments right for me -- and these shouldn't be restricted to just the privileged. I shouldn't need to go through any special process or testing before I can invest in public securities (such as leveraged and inverse funds) since I'm quite capable of understanding the risks
