Displaying 3201 - 3210 of 9026 Results
Technology has long played a central role in financial services innovation. It continues to do so today as many firms in the securities industry introduce new digital investment advice tools to assist in developing and managing investment portfolios. FINRA undertook a review of selected digital investment advice tools to assess these developments.
The observations and practices in this report
I'm not in favor of restrictions that punish intelligence and due diligence in order to protect ignorance. Making the system more fair with adequate enforcement against the bad actors that use detrimental activities to exploit and diminish shareholders equity would appear a much more effective approach to improving the systems performance. Naked short selling as an example.
I should be able to choose the public investments for me and my family.
I don't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged funds. I understand the risk associated with leveraged funds.
I have been investing since the year 1995 and have a good knowledge of US stock market. I chose leveraged fund because Nasdaq will
As an educated individual investor, I should be able to make investment decisions that are right for me and my family. I have a bachelors in engineering and a MBA. I shouldn't have to go through a special test before I can invest in public securities such as inverse and leveraged funds.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important part of my investment strategies. I use both leverage
Limiting investment options, such as leveraged and inverse funds, to those that meet special income or asset tests is clearly discriminatory. These types of restrictions allow for the wealthy to financially gain from certain economic opportunities, while investors who are economically challenged would not be allowed to take advantage. The government would be restricting people who freely desire
I am very concerned about the proposed regulations on complex products that could potentially put restrictions on the very important investment tools of leveraged and inverse funds. We as individual investors should have unrestricted access to any public investment of our choice. These investment tools provide critical means of balancing one's assets to maximize gains and minimize
Investors don't need these regulations. We understand that investing in financial markets can be risky. They can be appropriate in certain circumstances, and we can decide on our own where we want to invest. Passing a test or any other special process will only favor the "big boys" over individual investors. I use leveraged funds as a small part of my overall
Retail traders should have equal access to complex investments as institutional/professional traders.
Educating investors of risk through simple disclosures is important and a fair requirement before permitting trading. Any threshold test should be minimal and easily met (including for those with English as a second language). Have faith in the investor to understand the risks and manage their
I should be able to invest my hard earned money in any investment I wish to make. The idea of having to take a test is appalling. If I wish to use leverage or inverse funds as my investment is my decision!!! I am more than capable of investing my $. You waste time thinking of how can we justify our existence by coming up with another regulation. Do you think people read your diatribe that you
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding