I oppose thr proposed rule. I want to be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged and inverse funds are
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
Dear Honorable FINRA Reulators,
I have over thirty years of investing experience and I am very capable of understanding the risks of leverage and inverse funds in my portfolio. Please do not handicap my investing choices by placing unnecessary limitations, testing etc. on my investment decisions which include leveraged and inverse funds. Thank you for your consideration to not put restrictions
I am a government employee and also invest my hard earned money and do not want to see over regulations restricting my options while allowing big pocket companies access to the same investments. Please let us choose what we invest on and let us keep the responsibility to be informed and educated. We are adults and should not be tested for where we invest our money. Thank you.
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable
of understanding
I strongly and vehemently oppose any restrictions on my ability to trade freely. This is a blatant attempt to segregate investors based on a shaky litmus test to intentionally squash investors based on an elitist agenda to stifle the ability of the public to trade as they see fit and to make their own judgements based on personal risk tolerances and long term investments objectives. This type
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest as I see fit. I should be able to choose which investments are right for me and my purposes. I should not have to take a test in order to invest. These restrictions are nothing more than making it more difficult for small investors while allowing privileged classes the ability to profit from restricted investment classes. If you can invest in these
I would like to be allowed to invest as I choose without any special process like passing a test or getting special approval from my brokerage company. Think about the millions of people that invest in very risky cryptocurrencies. No regulations on that are there? Instead of trying to handcuff individual investors you should join efforts with the SEC and the CFTC to eliminate activities that
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I will be responsible for myself to
TO: All NASD Members and Other Interested Persons
SUMMARY
The NASD Board of Governors believes it is necessary to clarify its policy with respect to trading in stock and index options by members or persons associated with a member while in possession of material, non-public market information concerning imminent transactions of block size. Under certain circumstances, this type of activity,
