Displaying 3031 - 3040 of 9026 Results
I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I do not agree that any special process like passing a test to be able to invest in public securities and inverse leveraged funds. Making investors try and prove their ability to protect my investments puts a restriction on my ability to secure my entire portfolio of investments. I am NOT ALIGNED with this notice as it creates
Dear Regulators,
Individuals should be free to invest how they wish, without regulator claiming they know better. The legislation to ban certain types of trading to individuals limits their freedoms. There should be no expectation of tests, net worth, etc. The only requirement should be if someone has money, and wants to invest it. Leveraged funds and inverse funds are the only option for some
I am writing as a humble retail investor. Recent events and research have demonstrated that the entire securities market is built around big players taking money directly from retail investors and legitimate corporations who have zero recourse. The current system for reporting short sales is laughably ineffective. It is completely obscured from retail traders, intentionally preventing free trade
I oppose the restrictions on being able to buy public investments. I dont think I should have to take any type of test to see if I qualify to purchase any type of investment. I buy different types of investments including cryptos to diversify my investments. I have done quite well in the past with the stock market and plan on living off the investment returns through out my(our) retirement years
It is the responsibility of regulators to ensure funds are well managed, safe from fraud and equally accessible to all investors. It is not the responsibility of regulators to determine which funds specific investors are allowed to purchase. Regulators must not require any tests or assessments in an effort to "weed out" or discriminate against investors. Cryptocurrency funds are an
I - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. Explain that We are capable of understanding
I strongly oppose the regulation of types of investments I am able to make for myself and my family. This is the United States of America - we have the freedom to invest in the properties that we choose without special restrictions and without passing a test or having a minimum level of net worth and that should not change. I study long and hard before making an investment decision and do not
Free trade is free trade. I use inverse leveraged funds to help hedge my portfolio. In these volatile markets these are necessary tools to mitigate your personal risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leverage and inverse funds. I completely understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks. Public
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Senior ManagementCorporate FinanceInstitutionalLegal & ComplianceOptionsSyndicateTrading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved changes to Part II of Schedule D to the NASD By-Laws requiring NASDAQ companies to notify the NASD of material news
It is not the job of FINRA to determine what investments are "proper and allowable" for individuals - that is OUR choice! I use inverse funds to mitigate potential losses from our equity investments - so we can build an equity portfolio but limit potential losses during market swoons by balancing some of the equity positions with inverse funds without having to adjust our equity