I have a college degree in Business Administration. I have been very successful in investing in stocks, leveraged and inverse ETF's. About 85% of my investments are in leveraged and inverse ETF's. It's my money and the government should not tell me where to spend or invest it. Before the Government tells me how to manage my finances you should reduce/eliminate the
Ive been leveraged and inverse funds such as TQQQ and SQQQ for many years. I am aware the risk associated with these funds. They are volatile but manageable. Some individual stocks are even more volatile than these funds.
I believe majority of individual investors know the risk they are taking when making investment decisions including investing in leveraged and inverse funds. I personally dont
I haven't read the material yet, but at first blush this is quite an overreach. Not everyone can win - yet those that lose run to elected officials & want a refund for their poor risk management. Day trading "rules" changed nothing but the amount that could be lost to a greater amount. Time would be well spent helping the gamblers buying 0 DTE puts &
I have a self directed IRA. The balance in my retirement fund investments has increased since january while the major stock indexes are down close to 20%. I have done this with leveraged and inverse etf funds. I am not a licensed investor but I did educate myself for months to prepare for the obvious upcoming government imposed economic trainwreck. If my retirement fund was in a 401k I would
While I agree that some of these funds should be limited to qualified investors, restricting all of these will limit my ability as a middle-class investor to grow my wealth through the stock market. Either lower the bar for qualification to participate in these funds so the growing group of new retail investor can reap the rewards of these funds OR do not restrict them in the first place - it
NASD is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 7010 to modify pricing for NASD members using the ITS/CAES System and Inet facility, which are currently operated by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Nasdaq") as facilities of NASD.
Please don't take away my ability to invest in stocks like tqqq. I've used this to average approx 25% per year since the fund started. Right now, I'm in the situation where I will be able to retire in 10 years. If you take away my ability to hold tqqq, it push back my retirement by several years. Please don't do this. It will harm me greatly.
As an experienced non-accredited investor, I am totally opposed to limiting my investment options. Some of my best investments this year are on the list: commodity funds, managed futures funds, private REITs, etc. While stocks and bonds have performed very poorly in 2022, these investments have hedged some of my portfolios and actually perform well in an inflationary environment. Please do not
Many, many people buy and sell many forms of stocks. For both monthly income, and long term investments.
Further regulating how we can invest will add a financial strain to an already unstable economy. Not to mention raise the number of unemployed.
Government agencies should not have any authority over how we invest our money. Especially with a poor track record of properly managing anything.
I have a regular investment program that is long the market during part of every month and short during another part. It's been working fine for years. Being able to be in a short mutual fund or ETF does not "pick on" any particular stock. It just is a way to hedge other investments in case the market goes down. It is a more conservative way to invest that just
