Me and only me should decide what or what I can not buy for me and my family. I should not have to take classes or jump through any hoops to be able to do so.This is a free country and people should be able to purchase any stock they wish and should not only for the privileged. They had to start somewhere to get where they are and everyone should be given that choice
These regulations will more broadly effect individual investors and again give more advantage to institutions which already have significant advantages in the market. It is my decision if I wish to invest in leveraged stocks. You can help educate individuals but to take their decision making away from them is unlawful, Especially when my right to invest is not imposing on the rights of other
To regulate L&I index funds is a grossly misguided decision. If FINRA seeks to protect investors from complex products, they should instead go after options, derivatives, short-selling, and other truly complicated financial practices. L&I funds are traded by average retail investors like me in the same manner that stocks are traded; they are simple to understand and necessary to
FINRA's Arbitration Awards Online database (“AAO”) demonstrates our commitment to transparency by enabling users to perform web-based searches for FINRA arbitration awards free of charge, seven days a week.
Documents Available in the Arbitration Awards Online Database
In addition to FINRA awards, you can search for historical awards for the:
National Association of Securities Dealers (
Comments: I've been using Leveraged and Inverse ETFs for a few years now. While there are risks involved, there are risks with investing with Non-Leveraged and Non-Inverse ETFs, and with stocks. Accepting risks is part of investing. Limiting what I can invest in would do more harm than good and limit opportunities in the market. I don't want to see access limited to Leveraged and
I use inverse ETFs to reduce investment risk by hedging my common stock investments. We don't need additional advantages for the privileged, such as limiting access to these investments. I understand the risks of adverse ETFs and don't need protection. As for others, they may not understand the risks of investing at any time. Should we restrict them, how? Is there no responsibility for
August 16, 2001NASD Regulation reminds all firms that any order events received on an OATS business day must be reported to OATS by 04:00 Eastern Time (04:00:00 A.M.) the next calendar day. Those reports not received by 04:00 (04:00:00 A.M.) will be marked late.An OATS business day begins the second after the close of the day session of The Nasdaq Stock Market on one market day and ends at the
INFORMATIONAL
Trade Date—Settlement Date
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Internal Audit
Legal & Compliance
Municipal/Government Securities
Operations
Trading & Market Making
Trade Date-Settlement Date Schedule
The Suggested Routing function is meant to aid the reader of this document. Each NASD member firm should consider the appropriate distribution in the context
How dare you even think about making it more difficult for the general public to save for retirement. That you lump inverse funds along with leveraged funds is particularly damaging; you want the general public to try shorting stocks, really? You think that's less difficult than buying an inverse fund? Inverse ETFs are extremely important to my own trading, and have saved me more than
img.snapshot{border:1px solid #cccccc;margin-top:10px;}
.blueButton{
background-color: #1063A0;
color: #fff;
border-radius: 10px;
display: inline;
font-size: 14px;
max-width: 200px;
padding: 15px;
text-align: center;
text-transform: uppercase;
transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
width: calc(100% - 30px);
}
.blueButton a{color:#ffffff}
.Report_TOC{