Displaying 1431 - 1440 of 34826 Results
I believe that investing should be up to the choice of the individual investor. Government interference into the 'free market' is a heavy hand that weighs in favor of the large, investment firms. I vote that choices remain 'as is' with no adjustments or Government interference.
I am strongly against your SEC proposed rule #S7-24-15. We want less regulations from you not more.
I oppose the proposed plan
Stop trying [REDACTED] with retail investors! Enforce the rules on short hedge funds, stop dark pools and naked shorting. Retail has removed hedge funds from operating and we can remove your agency as well. Retail ain't nothing [REDACTED]
I've been investing in inverse and leveraged funds for the last 2 years. They're a valuable tool to gain exposure to other sides of positions, such as short ARKK (SARK) without having to worry about things such as options or short squeezes. Please reconsider any restrictions you may be considering.
With out access to these products the average investor is severely limited in ways they can hedge their investments. It also provides more avenues the average investor can utilize in our portfolios. Let us invest our money the way we want period.
I am fully against this regulation
I believe in free markets without much government interference so I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. Investment decisions should be figured out between my financial advisor and myself.
I am opposed to Rule #22-08. I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to demonstrate an net worth arbitrarily set nor be required to obtain broker permission to invest. I should not have to take a test to invest in public securities