As an investor, I am opposed to the additional regulations proposed in Regulatory Notice 22-08 restricting access to certain complex products.
There are sufficient requirements to provide information on the behavior of these investments and more than enough regulation on broker dealers to supervise the purchase and trading of these instruments.
We cannot regulate our way to more intelligent
I object to the proposed regulation that proposes to limit my access to certain investment vehicles. I consider any paternalistic regulations purporting to protect my interests as an invasion of my right to make my own investment decisions. In the matter of the leveraged and inverse ETFs being suggested for regulation, note that each presently carries declarations and warnings to investor. We
I want to continue to buy 3x leverage. I don't want any new regulations which can crash my tqqq.
Leveraged funds are important to my overall investing strategy. I understand the risks of investing in them and use them as part of a broader portfolio of investments to enhance my returns. In my opinion, leveraged etfs provide a MUCH safer alternative to many other common methods of increasing returns such as margin, options and investing in penny stocks. It would be unfair and unjust for
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Ishouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am concerned about possible restrictions to retail investors discussed in Notice 22-08. I currently personally use these types of "complex" investments to hedge against things like inflation or recession. These types ETFs make these investments accessible to people who are not institutional investors. I am concerned that the changes discussed will limit
I do oppose restrictions on my right to invest. I should be able to choose the investments that are right for my situation and time frame.
I believe as Americans we have the the right to invest and gain or loss is going to happen. Over regulating is unnecessary because it stifles our options.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investing. I am able to enhance my returns in this market. In turn, this allows me to take reduced risks in the "main" portion of my portfolio, especially to wait in cash until this market bottoms out or settles out. having some sort of imposed "cooling off" period may not allow me to take advantage of market
I oppose this as I believe I alone should be able to choose the public investment that is right for my myself and my family. I understand leverage and inverse funds and the risks associated because I am capable of making my own financial choices.