Displaying 741 - 750 of 28151 Results
this poses a severe and serious threat towards maket fairness. it's like locking us in home due to covid, but except the rich people and goverment people like you. retail traders or inverstors should have right to be freely choose whatever products and security that fit our trading strageties. Regulations should not be bias, only be supportative to rich people and people having authroitise.
I find it troubling that you are considering making unreasonable restrictions on my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds, for several reasons. I should be able to make my own decisions without your blessings, you know nothing about me. Also this will severely hamper my ability to be successful with stock investing. I don't think anyone is more concerned about my financial
I have been informed that the above referenced regulatory notice is being considered.
I strongly object to the intent of this proposed regulation. I do not believe that FINRA should be able to restrict my ability to chose my investments or to make me go thru a bureaucratic process to establish my right to make those investments. I have been trading these investment vehicles for many years and
Investors like myself do not need the regulatory eye of FINRA to oversee and dictate what securities people can buy and sell. I oppose all restrictions on the rights and freedom to invest funds in any way people want, including leveraged and inverse funds.
FINRAs definition of complex products is broad, arbitrary, vague, and unworkable. It would be an unacceptable infringement on investors and
I trade the leveraged funds, like I would trade options trading. I am allowed to do that, then why not this. Also if I am not allowed to buy, what will I do with all my holdings which amount to more than 1000,000 USD when I will not be able to sell them either. This is not legal. You will need to put these regulations in place only after giving enough notice for unwinding my positions. This will
Dear FINRA, the fundamental question you should ask is this: "Are you, as an investor, competent enough to make your own investment decisions (whether they are "complex" or otherwise)"? If one answer's this question as "Yes" then FINRA should have no further involvement. If one answers this question as "No" then FINRA, at most, should recommend sources
1.) Limiting investment opportunities to those with high net worth is inherently un-American and is borderline predatory on those who would be excluded from making these investment plays.
2.) Leveraged and inverse funds are crucial to my short and long term investment strategies. Information and notices are provided with these, and should continue to be. Expanding information requirements is a
I am a simplistic retail investor. I only invest in index funds and ETFS which track an index. I think much of the literature promotes this type of investing, but I believe if you are willing to invest in "complex" products then you should be allowed to. Though I not think this notice is recommending to restrict index funds; I am doubtful that once we begin restricting financial
Sec. 1. The annual meeting shall be on such date and at such place as the Board shall designate; provided, however, that, except for the first annual meeting following the Closing at which Large Firm Governors, the Mid-Size Governor and Small Firm Governors shall be elected, there shall be no annual meetings of members during the Transitional Period. The business of the meeting shall include: (a
Sec. 6. (a) Any officer may resign at any time upon written notice of resignation to the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, or the Secretary. Any such resignation shall take effect upon receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein. The acceptance of a resignation shall not be necessary to make the resignation effective.
(b) Any officer of the Corporation may be removed, with