Skip to main content

Guidance

We offer guidance to firms in the form of podcasts, webinars, FAQs, reports, and more. Use the toggle below to find guidance by topic, type or date. 

5 A B C D E F G H I L M N O P Q R S T V
Report / Study

In a letter to NASD Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Robert R. Glauber, dated January 15, 2003, former Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Chairman Harvey L. Pitt requested that NASD, joined by the Securities Industry Association (“SIA”) and the Investment Company Institute (“ICI”), convene a task force to recommend industry-wide changes to address errors and missed opportunities to provide discounts in the calculation of sales loads charged on the purchase of mutual fund shares that carry a front-end sales load.

July 12, 2003
Interpretive Letter

For purposes of reporting to TRACE only, a member may enter only bona fide commissions in the "commission" field and may charge a commission only in specified transactions.

July 11, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Member that serves as investment consultant and sub-administrator for certain mutual funds, but does not serve as either the principal underwriter or an investment adviser or sub-adviser to the funds, may state in its public communications that it does not offer proprietary products.

May 29, 2003
Report / Study

Fairness, integrity and efficiency make the U.S. capital markets the most successful in the world. In the past decade, more than 5,600 domestic and foreign enterprises raised an aggregate of over $500 billion through IPOs in U.S. markets. These IPOs served as an engine for corporate growth and active participation by all sectors of the investment community, from venture capitalists to large institutions and individual investors.

May 29, 2003
About FINRA
The Global Settlement followed joint investigations by the regulators into alleged conflicts of interest between investment banking and securities research at brokerage firms.
May 21, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Transactions in certain medium term notes, purchased and re-sold to retail customers during the offering period, should not be reported to TRACE as set forth in Rule 6230(e)(1) because the transactions are part of a primary distribution.

May 19, 2003
Guidance
The following checklist helps identify the basic requirements for members under the new and amended recordkeeping requirements to the SEC broker/dealer books and records rules.
May 02, 2003
FAQ
On October 25, 2001, the SEC adopted amendments to Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4. The purpose of this Notice is to address some frequently asked questions about the SEC requirements.
May 02, 2003
Interpretive Letter
Negative response letters may be used for a bulk transfer of customer accounts to a broker-dealer that will provide certain trading services that have been discontinued by member, provided the letters contain the disclosures described in Notice to Members 02-57.
May 01, 2003
Interpretive Letter

OATS Clock Synchronization Logs – Record Keeping Requirements.

April 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Clarification of application of OATS rules to customer allocations of executions.

April 02, 2003
Guidance

April 2003

April 01, 2003
Interpretive Letter

When a member exchanges TRACE-eligible securities for a Creation Unit of an exchange-traded fund ("ETF"), the transfer of TRACE-eligible securities is not required to be reported to TRACE. Similarly, when a member redeems a Creation Unit of an ETF and receives TRACE-eligible securities, their acquisition is not required to be reported to TRACE.

March 17, 2003
Regulatory and Compliance Alerts (RCA)

full_html

March 01, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Secondary market trading in Fresco Index Shares Funds would be consistent with the requirements of NASD Rules 2830(c) and (g).

February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter
Applicability of Rule 2510(d) to the use of negative response letters to transfer customer funds from money market mutual funds to interest bearing bank accounts.
February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter
The use of negative response letters to transfer customers serviced by "independent contractor" registered representatives from one introducing broker dealer to another may conflict with a member's obligation to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.
February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Direct payments of securities-based compensation by a member to the associated persons of another member are not permitted under NASD Rules 2820(g) and 2830(l) absent an SEC No-action letter or interpretive release. Further, proposed arrangement may require dual registration of associated persons.

February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Separate sales contests are permissible under NASD Rule 2820(g) for group variable contracts.

February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter
The use of negative response letters to transfer customers from one introducing broker/dealer to another may conflict with a member's obligation to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.
February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter
Separate sales contests under NASD Rule 2820(g) for group variable annuity contracts and employer-sponsored retirement plans.
February 03, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Direct payments of securities-based compensation by a member to the associated persons of another member are not permitted under NASD Rules 2820(g) and 2830(l) absent an SEC No-action letter or interpretive release. Further, proposed arrangement may require dual registration of associated persons.

February 03, 2003
Exemptive Letter
Exemptive relief is granted based on the following: (1) Name was not an MFP at the time the Contribution was made and was not engaged in, and did not supervise, municipal securities business; (2) the Firm took action once it became aware of the Contribution by retaining outside counsel to review the proposed reorganization and the possibility of municipal securities business restrictions as a result of the Contribution; (3) the Firm notified Name that when the municipal activities of certain retail sales brokers and MFP’s become part of the Business Unit on Month Day, 2003, the Firm will consider her to be an MFP and her municipal securities business activities will be restricted as a result of her Contribution and of her responsibilities3; (4) the Firm has agreed to restrict Name’s municipal securities activities, minimizing the potential for a quid pro quo resulting from the Contribution; and (5) although a less weighty factor, the Contribution has been returned.
January 07, 2003
Interpretive Letter

Application of NASD Rules to Member Firms using Pink Sheets Linkage.

December 12, 2002
Regulatory and Compliance Alerts (RCA)
full_html
December 01, 2002