Skip to main content

Epperson & Greenidge PA Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-07

FINRA should change FINRA Rules 12402 and 12403 so that all Claimants and all Respondents have to share the same number of strikes when ranking arbitrators. Under the current rule so long as a brokerage firm and the financial advisor are represented by different law firms then they would get twice as many strikes as a group of investors who are represented by the same law firm.  In criminal court all defendants have to share strikes for jury selection. It should be the same in FINRA arbitrations.

Cresap Inc. Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-06

Many in the small firm community believe that it is not the rules that are the problem, but how they are enforced. FINRA seems to devote too much time and too many resources examining well-intentioned firms that are devoid of customer complaints, and whose behavior is unlikely to cause customer harm. FINRA struggles to apply metrics to firms in determining how to deploy regulatory efforts. Here are some simple suggestions:

2018056490330 Joseph J. Steward CRD 3241331 AWC vr (2025-1749255600956).pdf

Between October 2019 and October 2021, Steward recommended to one retail customer a series of trades that were excessive, unsuitable, and not in the customer's best interest. As a result, Steward willfully violated the Best Interest Obligation under Rule 15/-l(a)(l) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Regulation BI or Reg BI) and violated FINRA Rules 2111 and 2010. For these violations, Steward is suspended for five months in all capacities and ordered to pay partial restitution of $6,000.