T+0. Instant settlement. No trading outside the lit market. No securing exchange security positions with bonded products; cash, margin, or owned stock only. Selling synthetic shorts depresses the stock price and defrauds the company in favor of market maker profits. Liquidity will come with instant settlement.
Regarding the stocks $AMC and $GME: There must be more transparency about short positions. There should be no self reported data from any entity, there must be a third party overseer. The loop holes regarding short positions and failed to deliver shares (FTD’s) need to be closed. These positions should be made to be paid out and the idea that hedge funds can hide positions in OTM positions or
They only thing that's preventing amc from going higher and squeezing is the dark pool and the corrupt hedge funds shorting the stock. As an investor, I only ask for a fair market for me and the other I vectors regardless what stock it is. For amc, this is a once In A lifetime opportunity for people to really believe they have a chance to make really good money and have a voice. 99% apes pr
There are countless things investors want changed in order to have a fair chance of succeeding in the open stock market without the mass manipulation and lack of transparency that is designed for the people to lose and the big institutions to take the profits. To put it simply, investors want accountability and enforcement of the current regulations. There are already many regulations in place,
There are countless things investors want changed in order to have a fair chance of succeeding in the open stock market without the mass manipulation and lack of transparency that is designed for the people to lose and the big institutions to take the profits. To put it simply, investors want accountability and enforcement of the current regulations. There are already many regulations in place,
I oppose restrictions on investing in public investments. My broker warns me that some are not suitable for long-term investments, and I heed my broker's advice. I have years of experience trading stocks and options and know the risks of what I am investing in. We have enough regulations especially in the stock and options areas. So, respectfully, let us act like the adults we are.
I use inverse funds to keep my savings from reducing because of inflation. In a time when stocks, bonds and cash are all loosing value, inverse funds are the easiest way to protect my savings. Put options are difficult to understand, and my brokerage will not let me short stocks directly.
If you want to discourage gambling tax trades and make casinos illegal.
I think it makes trading not fair and leveled for all people, if you limit trading leveraged etf, for having a certain amount of money and needing cooling time,
Warnings that we accept should be enough for ppl to know the risks.
And most ppl learn stocks from their own unofficial sources and making official curriculum, will make it hard for people with other jobs to invest in stocks
It is not the role of regulators to allow what investors can or should invest in. Regulators should however look at conflicts of interest, such as congressmen and women trading individual stocks. Dont limit the options of everyday investors who are already at a disadvantage. Regulate the advantaged (make hedge funds report more information, ban individual stock trades for congress, etc.) and
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Legal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
Executive Summary
On September 12, 1994, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved an NASD rule change that amends the Prompt Receipt and Delivery of Securities Interpretation (Interpretation) issued by the NASD Board of Governors under Article III, Section 1 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice. Specifically,
