FINRA is issuing this Information Notice to inform members of a scheduled industry presentation by the Cross Market Regulation Working Group (CMRWG) and FINRA CAT regarding SRO regulation of Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) Compliance Rules and FINRA CAT’s role in CAT compliance.
Please see the attached ISG CMRWG Regulatory Notice 2020-02 that was issued by the participants of the ISG CMRWG.
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Advertising
Continuing Education
Corporate Finance
Executive Representatives
Government Securities
Institutional
Insurance
Internal Audit
Legal & Compliance
Municipal
Mutual Fund
Operations
Options
Registered
Last Voting Date: May 31, 1994
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementLegal & Compliance
Executive Summary
The NASD invites members to vote on proposed amendments to Article III of the NASD By-Laws and to Part I of Schedule C to the By-Laws to require that initial application for NASD membership be reviewed by a Subcommittee designated by the District Committee, with right of appeal
Effective March 15, 1999
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Advertising
Continuing Education
Corporate Finance
Executive Representatives
Government Securities
Institutional
Insurance
Internal Audit
Legal & Compliance
Municipal
Mutual Fund
Operations
Options
Registered Representatives
Registration
Research
The number of arbitrators appointed to a case depends on the amount and type of relief requested in the Statement of Claim.
SEC Approves Amendments to Discovery Guide Used in Customer Arbitration Proceedings to Address Electronic Discovery, Product Cases and Affirmations
SUGGESTED ROUTING:*
Senior ManagementInternal AuditLegal & ComplianceMutual FundTraining*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
MAIL VOTE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The NASD invites members to vote on a proposed amendment to Article III, Sections 26 and 29 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice. The amendment would revise, simplify, and add a
Exemptive relief is granted based on representations that: the MFP and his spouse each intended to contribute $250 to the Candidate’s campaign; the MFP had pre-cleared a $250 contribution to the Candidate according to his Firm’s policies and procedures; the Firm identified the contribution through its supervisory process; the MFP requested and obtained a refund of the contribution; the Firm directed the Associate to refrain from certain communications involving the subject issuer; and the $500 contribution by the MFP and his spouse would not have triggered a ban on municipal securities business if the MFP and his spouse had both signed the check from their joint account or if they had written separate checks.
FINRA Announces Updates of the Interpretations of Financial and Operational Rules
SEC Approves Amendments to Arbitration Codes Relating to Subpoenas and Orders to Direct the Appearance of Witnesses and Production of Documents Without Subpoenas
